News Media and Attention Spillover across Energy Markets: A Powerful Predictor of Crude Oil Futures Prices

被引:8
作者
Cepni, Oguzhan [1 ,2 ]
Duc Khuong Nguyen [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sensoy, Ahmet [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Cent Bank Republ Turkey, Markets Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[3] IPAG Business Sch, Paris, France
[4] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Sch, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Prague Univ Econ & Business, Fac Finance & Accounting, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Bilkent Univ, Fac Business Adm, Ankara, Turkey
[7] Lebanese Amer Univ, Adnan Kassar Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Crude oil returns; Density forecasting; Investor attention; Timevarying Granger causality; Variable selection; INVESTOR ATTENTION; TERM STRUCTURE; STOCK RETURNS; SHOCKS; SELECTION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; PARAMETER; SENTIMENT; TESTS;
D O I
10.5547/01956574.43.SI1.ocep
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We develop two news-based investor attention measures from the news trends function of the Bloomberg terminal and investigate their predictive power for returns on crude oil futures contracts with various maturities. Our main results after controlling for relevant macroeconomic variables show that the Oil-based Institutional Attention Index is useful in predicting oil futures returns, especially during price downturn periods, while the forecasting accuracy is further improved when the Commodity Market Institutional Attention Index is used. This forecasting accuracy decreases, however, with the maturity of oil futures contracts. Moreover, we find some evidence of Granger-causality and regime-dependent interactions between investor attention measures and oil futures returns. Finally, variable selection algorithms matter before making predictions since they create the best forecasting results in many cases considered. These findings are important for informed traders and policymakers to better understand the price dynamics of the oil markets.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 25
页数:29
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Effects of Risk Aversion on the Value of Information in Two-Action Decision Problems [J].
Abbas, Ali E. ;
Bakir, N. Onur ;
Klutke, Georgia-Ann ;
Sun, Zhengvvei .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2013, 10 (03) :257-275
[2]   Google search keywords that best predict energy price volatility [J].
Afkhami, Mohamad ;
Cormack, Lindsey ;
Ghoddusi, Hamed .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 :17-27
[3]   Convenience yield in commodity price modeling: A regime switching approach [J].
Almansour, Abdullah .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 53 :238-247
[4]   Investor attention and stock market activity: Evidence from France [J].
Aouadi, Amal ;
Arouri, Mohamed ;
Teulon, Frederic .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 35 :674-681
[5]   Do oil prices respond to real interest rates? [J].
Arora, Vipin ;
Tanner, Matthew .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :546-555
[6]   Real-Time Measurement of Business Conditions [J].
Aruoba, S. Boragan ;
Diebold, Francis X. ;
Scotti, Chiara .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2009, 27 (04) :417-427
[7]   Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models [J].
Bai, JS ;
Ng, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :191-221
[8]   Forecasting the term structure of crude oil futures prices with neural networks [J].
Barunik, Jozef ;
Malinska, Barbora .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 164 :366-379
[9]  
Basistha A., 2015, 134 NCCC
[10]   It Depends on Where You Search: Institutional Investor Attention and Underreaction to News [J].
Ben-Rephael, Azi ;
Da, Zhi ;
Israelsen, Ryan D. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (09) :3009-3047