The Costs and Their Determinant of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Delivery: An Exploratory Study in Chongqing Municipality, China

被引:16
作者
He, Zhifei [1 ]
Cheng, Zhaohui [1 ]
Wu, Tailai [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [2 ]
Chen, Junguo [3 ]
Fu, Qian [1 ]
Feng, Zhanchun [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Med & Hlth Management, Tongji Med Coll, 13 Hangkong Rd, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, 301 Baosheng Rd, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China
[3] Third Mil Med Univ, Inst Higher Med Educ, 35 Gaotanyan Rd, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
HEALTH-INSURANCE; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; ALTERNATIVE MODES; PERINATAL HEALTH; ECONOMIC-ASPECTS; GLOBAL SURVEY; RATES; BIRTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1155/2016/5685261
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study aims to analyze the cesarean section (CS) rates and vaginal delivery rates in tertiary hospitals of China, explore the costs of two different deliveries, and examine the relative influencing factors of the costs in both CS and vaginal deliveries. Methods. 30,168 anonymized obstetric medical cases were selected from three sample tertiary hospitals in Chongqing Municipality from 2011 to 2013. Chi-square test was used to compare the distributions of CS and vaginal deliveries under different indicators. Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test were adopted to analyze the differences under different items. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the influencing factors of the costs of different delivery modes. Results. (1) The rates of CS were 69%, 65.5%, and 59.2% in the three sample tertiary hospitals in Chongqing from 2011 to 2013. (2) The costs and the length of stay of CS were greater than those of vaginal delivery, which had significant differences (p < 0.005). (3) The areas, length of stay, age, medical insurance, and modes of delivery were the influencing factors of both CS and vaginal delivery costs. Discussion. The high CS rates in China must be paid significant attention. The indicators of two modes of delivery should be regulated strictly. CS rate reduction and saving medical resources will be the benefits if vaginal delivery is chosen by pregnant women.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Economic implications of method of delivery [J].
Allen, VM ;
O'Connell, CM ;
Farrell, SA ;
Baskett, TF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :192-197
[2]   The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity [J].
Beck, Stacy ;
Wojdyla, Daniel ;
Say, Lale ;
Betran, Ana Pilar ;
Merialdi, Mario ;
Requejo, Jennifer Harris ;
Rubens, Craig ;
Menon, Ramkumar ;
Van Look, Paul F. A. .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (01) :31-38
[3]   Rates of caesarean section:: analysis of global, regional and national estimates [J].
Betran, Ana P. ;
Merialdi, Mario ;
Lauer, Jeremy A. ;
Bing-Shun, Wang ;
Thomas, Jane ;
Van Look, Paul ;
Wagner, Marsden .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :98-113
[4]  
Betran AP, 2010, 29 WHO
[5]   Dramatic increase of Cesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China [J].
Bogg, Lennart ;
Huang, Kun ;
Long, Qian ;
Shen, Yuan ;
Hemminki, Elina .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2010, 70 (10) :1544-1549
[6]   Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China [J].
Cai, WW ;
Marks, JS ;
Chen, CHC ;
Zhuang, YX ;
Morris, L ;
Harris, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (05) :777-780
[7]  
Carine R, 2006, LANCET, V368, P1189
[8]  
Chen X. Q., 2014, J CHINA PRESCRIPTION, V12, P8
[9]   Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births [J].
Declercq, Eugene ;
Barger, Mary ;
Cabral, Howard J. ;
Evans, Stephen R. ;
Kotelchuck, Milton ;
Simon, Carol ;
Weiss, Judith ;
Heffner, Linda J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (03) :669-677
[10]   The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates [J].
Dubay, L ;
Kaestner, R ;
Waidmann, T .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (04) :491-522