Incidental splenectomy during left radical nephrectomy: Reasons and ways to avoid it

被引:10
作者
Carmignani, G [1 ]
Traverso, P [1 ]
Corbu, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Osped San Martino Genova, Urol Clin, Dept Urol, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词
incidental splenectomy; left radical nephrectomy; renal cancer; urologic surgery; oncological surgery;
D O I
10.1159/000050986
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Left radical nephrectomy is the second most common cause of incidental splenectomy during transabdominal oncological surgery in the upper left quadrant of the abdomen. The potential sequelae of splenic ablation are often underestimated and generally no systematic planned efforts have been undertaken to avoid a splenic injury. Material and Methods: We evaluated the incidence of iatrogenic splenectomy in 333 cases of left radical nephrectomy for renal cancer performed at our institute between 1970 and 1999. Two slightly different surgical techniques were adopted and after 1995 particular attention was paid to the possible causes of intraoperative splenic injury and how to avoid it. In the first group of patients (1970-1994) an anterolateral xipho-umbilical-subcostal approach was used, and in the second group (1995-1999) a cruciate 'Mercedes-like' incision was always adopted. Results: The incidence of iatrogenic splenectomy in the first group of patients was 13.2%, and only 2.6% in the second group. The mortality rate in the first group of patients was 6%; no mortality has been recorded in the second group. Postoperative infections averaged 12.1% in the first group and 11.6% in the second, without any difference between the two groups. However, if we consider the incidence of postoperative infections in splenectomy cases, the incidence reaches 24.2% in the first group versus no cases in the second. Conclusions: Incidental splenectomy is a potentially severe complication of transabdominal left radical nephrectomy and is often considered a price that has to be paid, particularly in cases of large tumoral masses. A more detailed knowledge of splenic anatomy, a critical consideration of the intraoperative factors that may lead to splenectomy, and the adoption of a surgical tactic borrowed from the techniques of liver transplant significantly lower the incidence of iatrogenic splenectomy. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 198
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The use of liver transplant techniques to aid in the surgical management of urological tumors [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Hawke, C ;
Soloway, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) :665-672
[2]   Splenectomy complicating left nephrectomy [J].
Cooper, CS ;
Cohen, MB ;
Donovan, JF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) :30-36
[3]   SEVERE LATE POSTSPLENECTOMY INFECTION [J].
CULLINGFORD, GL ;
WATKINS, DN ;
WATTS, ADJ ;
MALLON, DF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (06) :716-721
[4]   Incidental splenic injury during abdominal vascular surgery: A case-controlled analysis [J].
Eaton, MA ;
Valentine, J ;
Jackson, MR ;
Modrall, G ;
Clagett, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 190 (01) :58-64
[5]  
ELLISON FC, 1983, SURG CLIN N AM, V63, P1313
[6]   The Giuliani muscle splitting and nerve-sparing anterolateral transabdominal approach to the kidney [J].
Giberti, C ;
Martorana, G ;
Carmignani, G .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (06) :911-914
[7]   PERITONEAL ANATOMY OF SPLEEN WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO OPERATION OF PARTIAL GRASTRECTOMY [J].
LORD, MD ;
GOUREVITCH, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1965, 52 (03) :202-+
[8]   APPLICATION OF LIVER-TRANSPLANT AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT TECHNIQUES TO DIFFICULT UPPER ABDOMINAL UROLOGICAL CASES [J].
MARSH, CL ;
LANGE, PH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (06) :1652-1656
[9]   Mortality and morbidity after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma using a transperitoneal anterior subcostal incision [J].
Mejean, A ;
Vogt, B ;
Quazza, JE ;
Chretien, Y ;
Dufour, B .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (04) :298-302
[10]   MODIFIED CRUCIATE INCISION FOR TRANSABDOMINAL RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY [J].
THOMALLA, JV ;
FRIEND, PJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (06) :1245-1247