Pseudo-dynamic approach for active thrust of submerged soils

被引:24
作者
Bellezza, Ivo [1 ]
D'Alberto, Diego [2 ]
Fentini, Roberta [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Marche, Univ Politecn Marche, Ancona, Italy
[2] SPS Soc Progettaz Serv, Ancona, Italy
关键词
geotechnical engineering; retaining walls; seismic engineering; WATERFRONT RETAINING WALL; SEISMIC DESIGN; STABILITY; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1680/geng.10.00103
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The proper calculation of dynamic thrust is a key issue in the design of rigid retaining walls in seismically active zones. Although the Mononobe-Okabe approach is widely used in practical applications, the pseudo-dynamic approach has been introduced in recent years, and provides a more realistic representation of an earthquake compared to the pseudo-static approach. Whereas studies in the past have focused on dry backfills, to the authors' knowledge there is no specific literature dedicated to pseudo-dynamic analysis for submerged soils; in certain studies dealing with waterfront areas, the pseudo-dynamic analysis - valid for dry soils - has been incorrectly extended to submerged backfills as well. In this paper, a more rational pseudo-dynamic approach is developed for fully submerged soil under the assumption that a restrained or free water condition exists within the backfill. The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed analysis is perfectly consistent with the widely used pseudo-static approach. The analysis is also extended to account for amplification phenomena. Within a range of practical interest of soil and seismic input parameters, the acting point of the seismic active thrust is found to be very close to a height of H/3 from the base of the wall.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 333
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Seismic design factor for sliding of waterfront retaining wall [J].
Ahmad, S. M. ;
Choudhury, D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 162 (05) :269-276
[2]   Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic design for waterfront reinforced soil-wall [J].
Ahmad, Syed Mohd. ;
Choudhury, Deepankar .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2008, 26 (04) :291-301
[3]   STABILITY OF WATERFRONT RETAINING WALL SUBJECTED TO PSEUDO-DYNAMIC EARTHQUAKE FORCES AND TSUNAMI [J].
Ahmad, Syed Mohd. ;
Choudhury, Deepankar .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, 2008, 2 (02) :107-131
[4]   Seismic active pressure distribution history behind rigid retaining walls [J].
Azad, Ali ;
Yasrobi, Shahab ;
Pak, Ali .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 28 (05) :365-375
[5]  
CEN (European Committee for Standardization), 2005, 19985 EN CEN
[6]   Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method [J].
Choudhury, D ;
Nimbalkar, S .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2005, 55 (09) :699-702
[7]   Stability of waterfront retaining wall subjected to pseudodynamic earthquake [J].
Choudhury, Deepankar ;
Ahmad, Syed Mohd .
JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (04) :252-260
[8]   Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall [J].
Choudhury, Deepankar ;
Nimbalkar, Sanjay .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 24 (05) :1103-1113
[9]   Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method: Passive case [J].
Choudhury, Deepankar ;
Nimbalkar, Sanjay .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (03) :242-249
[10]   Seismic Rotational Displacement of Gravity Walls by Pseudodynamic Method [J].
Choudhury, Deepankar ;
Nimbalkar, Sanjay S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2008, 8 (03) :169-175