Bioequivalence study of a generic quetiapine in healthy male volunteers

被引:0
作者
Mahatthanatrakul, W. [1 ]
Rattana, K. [1 ]
Sriwiriyajan, S. [1 ]
Wongnawa, M. [1 ]
Ridtitid, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Pharmacol, Songkhla, Thailand
关键词
bioequivalence; pharmacokinetics; quetiapine; Quantia 200 (R); Seroquel (R);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: To study the bioequivalence of a generic quetiapine (Quantia 200(R), manufactured by the Unison Laboratories Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand) and the innovator product (Seroquel(R), AstraZeneca, Macelesfield, UK). Volunteers and methods: The study was a randomized, 2-way crossover design with a 2-week washout period in 24 healthy Thai male volunteers. After a single 200 mg oral dosing, serial blood samples were collected at appropriate interval up to 48 h. Plasma quetiapine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the WinNonlin(R) software with noncompartment model analysis. Comparative bioequivalence between the two formulations was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 2-way crossover design. Results: The mean +/- SD of maximum plasma concentration (C-max), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 - 48 h (AUC(0-48)) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-x)) of Quantia 200(R) vs. Seroquel(R) were 886.60 +/- 356.50 vs. 811.34 +/- 323.37 ng/ml; 3,754.41 +/- 1,453.00 vs. 3,420.00 +/- 1,229.6 ng x h/ml and 4,015.35 +/- 1,528.25 vs. 3,769.45 +/- 1,296.69 ng x h/ml, respectively. Time to reach C-max (t(max)) of Quantia 200(R) and Seroquel(R) were 1.08 +/- 0.778 and 1.10 +/- 0.79 h, respectively, and thus not significantly different. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of the logarithmically transformed of C-max, AUC(0-48) and AUC(0-x) were 98.21 - 124.37%, 94.43 - 117.03% and 94.77 - 116.61% , respectively, which were within the acceptable range of 80 - 125%. Power of the test for C-max, AUC(0-48) and AUC(0-x) was 92.1%, 96.9% and 97.4%. respectively. Conclusion: Quantia 200(R), used in this study, was bioequivalent to Seroquel(R) in terms of both the rate and extent of absorption.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 496
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
*CDER, 2001, GUID IND BIOAN METH, P4
[2]  
Crismon MLDP, 2002, PHARMACOTHERAPY PATH, P1219
[3]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of quetiapine - An atypical antipsychotic [J].
DeVane, CL ;
Nemeroff, CB .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2001, 40 (07) :509-522
[4]   Time course of central nervous dopamine-D2 and 5-HT2 receptor blockade and plasma drug concentrations after discontinuation of quetiapine (Seroquel®) in patients with schizophrenia [J].
Gefvert, O ;
Bergström, M ;
Långström, B ;
Lundberg, T ;
Lindström, L ;
Yates, R .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 135 (02) :119-126
[5]  
Goren JL, 1998, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V18, P1183
[6]   In vitro prediction of potential metabolic drug interactions for Seroquel [J].
Grimm, SW ;
Stams, KR ;
Bui, K .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (1-2) :198-198
[7]  
Hasselstrom Jorgen, 2006, Drug Metabolism and Drug Interactions, V21, P187
[8]  
KODAKIMBLE MA, 2001, APPL THERAPEUTICS CL, P76
[9]  
Li KY, 2004, ACTA PHARMACOL SIN, V25, P390
[10]   HPLC analysis of the novel antipsychotic drug quetiapine in human plasma [J].
Mandrioli, R ;
Fanali, S ;
Ferranti, A ;
Raggi, MA .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2002, 30 (04) :969-977