Delayed reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana improves fitness in soil with suboptimal phosphorus availability

被引:63
作者
Nord, Eric A. [1 ]
Lynch, Jonathan P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Intercoll Program Ecol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Hort, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
phenology; resource acquisition; roots;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01857.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Low phosphorus availability (low P) often delays flowering and maturity in annual plants, while abiotic stress generally accelerates flowering and maturity. The utility of this response is unknown. We hypothesize that phenological delay in low P is beneficial by permitting more time for phosphorus acquisition and utilization. We grew seven genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana with contrasting phenology in high and low P. Low P delayed bolting and maturity in all genotypes. Low P decreased root length, but not root-length duration (the integral of root length over time), because phenological delay allowed low-P plants to compensate for shorter root length. Root-length duration was correlated with phosphorus accumulation. Leaf phosphorus duration (the integral of leaf phosphorus over time) was correlated with reproductive biomass, indicating the utility of increased phosphorus utilization. Phenological delays accounted for up to 30% of biomass production when low-P plants were compared to models of plants with no delays. These results support the hypothesis that phenological delay in low P is adaptive and leads to increased phosphorus acquisition and utilization. Because low P conditions are prevalent, understanding the utility of this response could be useful in crop breeding and in predicting plant responses to global climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1441
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   OPTIMAL REPRODUCTIVE EFFORTS AND THE TIMING OF REPRODUCTION OF ANNUAL PLANTS IN RANDOMLY VARYING ENVIRONMENTS [J].
AMIR, S ;
COHEN, D .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 147 (01) :17-42
[2]   Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals:: What should we breed for? [J].
Araus, JL ;
Slafer, GA ;
Reynolds, MP ;
Royo, C .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2002, 89 :925-940
[3]  
Barber, 1995, SOIL NUTR BIOAVAILAB
[4]  
CHAUHAN YS, 1992, TROP AGRIC, V69, P235
[5]  
Comerford NB, 1999, CUR TOP PL, V19, P136
[6]  
Dorn LA, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1982, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01242.x
[7]  
EPSTEIN E, 1972, P412
[8]   Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants [J].
Fitter, AH ;
Fitter, RSR .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5573) :1689-1691
[9]   Response of barley genotypes to terminal soil moisture stress:: phenology, growth, and yield [J].
Gonzalez, Agueda ;
Martin, Isaura ;
Ayerbe, Luis .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2007, 58 (01) :29-37
[10]   CERES-maize predictions of maize phenology under nitrogen-stressed conditions in Nigeria [J].
Gungula, DT ;
Kling, JG ;
Togun, AO .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (04) :892-899