What (a) Difference a Degree Makes: The Evaluation of the New Social Work Degree in England

被引:40
作者
Orme, Joan [1 ,2 ]
MacIntyre, Gillian
Green Lister, Pam
Cavanagh, Kate [3 ]
Crisp, Beth R. [4 ]
Hussein, Shereen
Manthorpe, Jill [5 ]
Moriarty, Jo
Sharpe, Endellion
Stevens, Martin
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow Sch Social Work, Glasgow G13 1PP, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow Sch Social Work, Glasgow G13 1PP, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Stirling, Dept Appl Social Sci, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[5] Kings Coll London, Social Care Workforce Res Unit, London, England
关键词
VIGNETTE TECHNIQUE; PROCESS KNOWLEDGE; EDUCATION; PROGRAMS; JUDGMENT; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1093/bjsw/bcm095
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
After many years of debate in the UK about the need for a degree-level qualification in social work, the arguments for a minimum degree-level qualification were accepted. The requirements for the degree in England were developed drawing on work from a number of sources, including a benchmark statement for undergraduate degrees in social work and focus groups with stakeholders. The new degree in England, launched in 2003, involves one extra years study; improvements in the qualifying standard for social work; and specific curriculum and entrance requirements. At the time of launching the degree, the government department responsible for funding (Department of Health) commissioned a three-year evaluation of the implementation of the new degree to establish whether the new qualifying level leads to improvements in the qualified workforce. The aim of the evaluation is to describe the experiences of those undertaking the degree, collect the views of the various stakeholders about the effectiveness of the degree and measure the impact of a degree-level qualification on those entering the workforce. This article, written by the team undertaking the evaluation of the England degree, explores the reasons for the methodological approach adopted and the issues that have arisen in setting up the research.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 178
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The National Occupational Standards for Social Work
[2]  
Barnett R., 1994, LIMITS COMPETENCE KN
[3]  
Barter C., 1999, Social Research Update, V25, P1, DOI DOI 10.3171/jns.2000.93.1.0033
[4]  
Benner P., 1984, NOVICE EXPERT EXCELL, DOI [10.1097/00000446-198412000-00027, DOI 10.1097/00000446-198412000-00027]
[5]  
Boyer C., 2002, HIGHLIGHTS 8 HON SUR
[6]   Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? [J].
Braithwaite, D ;
Emery, J ;
de Lusignan, S ;
Sutton, S .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 20 (05) :545-551
[7]  
Brewer J., 2006, FDN MULTIMETHOD RES
[8]  
Carpenter J., 2005, Evaluating Outcomes in Social Work Education
[9]  
CAVALLONE AM, 1998, CONT ISSUES SOCIAL W
[10]  
*CENTR COUNC ED TR, 1991, RUL REQ DIPL SOC WOR