Valuing financial, health, and environmental benefits of Bt cotton in Pakistan

被引:41
作者
Kouser, Shahzad [1 ]
Qaim, Matin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D62; I15; Q51; Q57; Bt cotton; Pesticide use; Health and environmental benefits; Choice experiment; Pakistan; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED COTTON; PESTICIDE USE; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PEST-MANAGEMENT; FARMERS HEALTH; IMPACT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONSEQUENCES; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12014
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Data from a farm survey and choice experiment are used to value the benefits of Bt cotton in Pakistan. Unlike previous research on the economic impacts of Bt, which mostly concentrated on financial benefits in terms of gross margins, we also quantify and monetize health and environmental benefits associated with technology adoption. Due to lower chemical pesticide use on Bt cotton plots, there are significant health advantages in terms of fewer incidents of acute pesticide poisoning, and environmental advantages in terms of higher farmland biodiversity and lower soil and groundwater contamination. Farmers themselves value these positive effects at US$ 79 per acre, of which half is attributable to health and the other half to environmental improvements. Adding average gross margin gains of US$ 204 results in aggregate benefits of US$ 283 per acre, or US$ 1.8 billion for the total Bt cotton area in Pakistan.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 335
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation
    Adamowicz, W
    Swait, J
    Boxall, P
    Louviere, J
    Williams, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) : 65 - 84
  • [2] The Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton and Poverty Reduction in Pakistan
    Ali, Akhter
    Abdulai, Awudu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 61 (01) : 175 - 192
  • [3] Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants
    Andow, DA
    Zwahlen, C
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) : 196 - 214
  • [4] [Anonymous], ADV EC ANAL POLICY
  • [5] [Anonymous], AGR STAT PAK 2007 20
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1986, LTD DEPENDENT QUALIT
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification: 2009
  • [8] Farmers' perceptions of insect pests and pest management practices in Bt cotton in the Punjab, Pakistan
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Suhail, Anjum
    Gogi, M. Dildar
    Yaseen, M.
    Asghar, M.
    Tayyib, M.
    Karar, Haider
    Hafeez, Faisal
    Ullah, Unsar Naeem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2009, 55 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [9] Agrifood supply chain, private-sector standards, and farmers' health: evidence from Kenya
    Asfaw, Solomon
    Mithoefer, Dagmar
    Waibel, Hermann
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (3-4) : 251 - 263
  • [10] Bateman I.J., 2003, Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods