Mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy following previous instrumental delivery

被引:10
作者
Lurie, Samuel [1 ]
Steinberg, Netanel [1 ,2 ]
Tannus, Samer [1 ,2 ]
Golan, Abraham [1 ,2 ]
Sadan, Oscar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holon, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Cesarean section; instrumental delivery; subsequent delivery; LABOR;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2012-0104
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess mode of subsequent delivery in women with previous instrumental vaginal delivery. Study design: In this retrospective longitudinal study we followed women who underwent instrumental delivery. The study group included all consecutive parturient women who underwent an instrumental vaginal delivery during a 24-month period (1996-1999). We then identified women who had a subsequent delivery in our center until the end of the year 2010. The control group included women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery from the same time. Results: During the index period we had 349 consecutive successful instrumental vaginal deliveries. Of those, 125 women had a subsequent delivery in our center (35.8%). In subsequent pregnancies, the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was 76.8% and 90.4%; the instrumental delivery rate was 8.8% and 1.6%; and the cesarean rate was 14.4% and 8.0%, in the instrumental delivery, and spontaneous vaginal delivery groups, respectively (P<0.05). The odds ratio for a woman to undergo either an instrumental delivery or a cesarean after having an instrumental delivery in a previous pregnancy was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.9, P<0.05). Conclusion: Women with a previous instrumental delivery are at an increased risk of requiring either an instrumental delivery or a cesarean section in a subsequent pregnancy compared with women with a previous spontaneous vaginal delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 286
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study [J].
Bahl, R ;
Strachan, B ;
Murphy, DJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7435) :311-314
[2]  
Greenhill JP., 1955, OBSTETRICS, p[190, 193]
[3]   Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery [J].
Jolly, J ;
Walker, J ;
Bhabra, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (03) :227-232
[4]  
KADAR N, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V62, P166
[5]   SAFE EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA PERFORMED DURING LABOR BY AN OBSTETRICIAN [J].
LURIE, S ;
FEINSTEIN, M ;
BLICKSTEIN, I ;
CASPI, B ;
MATZKEL, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1991, 34 (03) :229-233
[6]  
Lurie S, 2005, J REPROD MED, V50, P759
[7]   Re-laparotomy after cesarean section [J].
Lurie, Samuel ;
Sadan, Oscar ;
Golan, Abraham .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2007, 134 (02) :184-187
[8]   Pregnancy Outcome and Mode of Delivery After a Previous Operative Vaginal Delivery [J].
Melamed, Nir ;
Ben-Haroush, Avi ;
Chen, Rony ;
Pardo, Joseph ;
Hod, Moshe ;
Yogev, Yariv .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (04) :757-763
[9]   What to do after a failed attempt of vacuum delivery? [J].
Sadan, O ;
Ginath, S ;
Gomel, A ;
Abramov, D ;
Rotmensch, S ;
Boaz, M ;
Glezerman, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 107 (02) :151-155
[10]   EFFECT OF TYPE OF DELIVERY ON FUTURE CHILDBEARING [J].
STEER, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1950, 60 (02) :395-400