LPost-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies

被引:3
作者
Aui, Alvina [1 ]
Wang, Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Biofuels; Cellulosic ethanol; Renewable fuel standard (RFS); Policy analysis; Cost-benefit analysis; National Energy Modeling System (NEMS); GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113221
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cellulosic ethanol is a sustainable and low-emission transportation fuel, but production has been low in the past years. Existing policies, including the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and producers' tax credit, have been driving the market for cellulosic ethanol. But they are expected to expire at the end of 2022 and their efficacy is compromised by multiple waivers and exemptions. This study models potential regulatory and financial policy instruments and evaluates their cost-effectiveness in supporting cellulosic ethanol in the post-RFS era using the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), a hybrid computational general equilibrium model of the U.S. energy market. The analysis suggests that the high volumetric mandate and financial subsidy will increase cellulosic ethanol production from 20.78 million liters (ML) to 57.84-65.94 ML in 2050. When policies are bundled, they will boost production reaching 63.29-65.94 ML more quickly than a singular policy. Finally, cost-benefit analysis and sensitivity analysis were employed to study the tradeoff of economic cost and environmental benefits of the policies. The result finds that the high mandate scenario has the greatest net benefit, which is more cost-effective than other policy instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alternative Fuel Data, 2018, VEH FUEL EFF CAFE RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Renewable Fuel Standard Program
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Renewable Fuel Standard
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ANN ENERGY OUTLOOK 2
[5]  
Argonne National Laboratory, 2021, ARG GREET MOD
[6]   Evaluating the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol: A meta-analysis of techno-economic analysis studies [J].
Aui, A. ;
Wang, Y. ;
Mba-Wright, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 145
[7]   Do big goals lead to bad policy? How policy feedback explains the failure and success of cellulosic biofuel in the United States [J].
Breetz, Hanna L. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 69
[8]   Second generation biofuels: Economics and policies [J].
Carriquiry, Miguel A. ;
Du, Xiaodong ;
Timilsina, Govinda R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (07) :4222-4234
[9]  
Cason M., 2014, COST BENEFIT CASE ST
[10]   Public policy and biofuels: The way forward? [J].
Charles, Michael B. ;
Ryan, Rachel ;
Ryan, Neal ;
Oloruntoba, Richard .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (11) :5737-5746