Effect of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone Therapy in Adult Patients With Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:8
作者
Lyu, Qing-Quan [1 ]
Chen, Qi-Hong [1 ]
Zheng, Rui-Qiang [1 ]
Yu, Jiang-Quan [1 ]
Gu, Xiao-Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
septic shock; hydrocortisone; mortality; meta-analysis; CAMPAIGN INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; SEVERE SEPSIS; ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY; CYTOKINE LEVELS; CORTICOSTEROIDS; VASOPRESSIN; MORTALITY; FLUDROCORTISONE; MANAGEMENT; STEROIDS;
D O I
10.1177/0885066618803062
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The efficacy of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy in the management of septic shock remains controversial in critical care for many years. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with trial sequential analysis (TSA) to evaluate its effect on clinical outcome among adult patients with septic shock. Methods: We identified relevant RCTs published from inception to March 7, 2018 comparing low-dose hydrocortisone with placebo or no intervention in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock. Meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's instrument. Trial sequential analysis was used to pool the results from the included studies for the primary outcomes. Results: Thirteen studies were retrieved by our literature search strategy. There were no significant differences in 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-1.00;P= .05) and hospital mortality (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82-1.02;P= .09) between the 2 groups, which were confirmed by TSA. However, there was a significant improvement in shock reversal in the hydrocortisone group (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.02-1.72;P= .03). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone statistically reduced the rate of 28-day mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.97;P= .03), ICU mortality (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63-0.95;P= .02), and hospital mortality (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63-0.95;P= .01) in comparison with the placebo, the results were also confirmed by TSA. Conclusion: Among adult patients with septic shock, the use of low-dose hydrocortisone compared with control did not confer overall survival benefits, albeit improving shock reversal rate. The benefit of reducing 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and hospital mortality was observed in combination use of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 983
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Bland, J. Martin
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [2] Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock
    Annane, D.
    Renault, A.
    Brun-Buisson, C.
    Megarbane, B.
    Quenot, J. -P.
    Siami, S.
    Cariou, A.
    Forceville, X.
    Schwebel, C.
    Martin, C.
    Timsit, J. -F.
    Misset, B.
    Benali, M. Ali
    Colin, G.
    Souweine, B.
    Asehnoune, K.
    Mercier, E.
    Chimot, L.
    Charpentier, C.
    Francois, B.
    Boulain, T.
    Petitpas, F.
    Constantin, J. -M.
    Dhonneur, G.
    Baudin, F.
    Combes, A.
    Bohe, J.
    Loriferne, J. -F.
    Amathieu, R.
    Cook, F.
    Slama, M.
    Leroy, O.
    Capellier, G.
    Dargent, A.
    Hissem, T.
    Maxime, V.
    Bellissant, E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (09) : 809 - 818
  • [3] Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock
    Annane, D
    Sébille, V
    Charpentier, C
    Bollaert, PE
    François, B
    Korach, JM
    Capellier, G
    Cohen, Y
    Azoulay, E
    Troché, G
    Chaumet-Riffaut, P
    Bellissant, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (07): : 862 - 871
  • [4] Corticosteroids for treating sepsis
    Annane, Djillali
    Bellissant, Eric
    Bollaert, Pierre Edouard
    Briegel, Josef
    Keh, Didier
    Kupfer, Yizhak
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (12):
  • [5] Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults A Systematic Review
    Annane, Djillali
    Bellissant, Eric
    Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard
    Briegel, Josef
    Confalonieri, Marco
    De Gaudio, Raffaele
    Keh, Didier
    Kupfer, Yizhak
    Oppert, Michael
    Meduri, G. Umberto
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (22): : 2362 - 2375
  • [6] Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock: a randomized controlled trial
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Aljumah, Abdulrahman
    Dabbagh, Ousama
    Tamim, Hani M.
    Rishu, Asgar H.
    Al-Abdulkareem, Abdulmajeed
    Al Knawy, Bandar
    Hajeer, Ali H.
    Tamimi, Waleed
    Cherfan, Antoine
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) : 1971 - 1977
  • [7] Diagnosis and treatment of adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill patient
    Asare, Kwame
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 27 (11): : 1512 - 1528
  • [8] Global utilization of low-dose corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock: a report from the PROGRESS registry
    Beale, Richard
    Janes, Jonathan M.
    Brunkhorst, Frank M.
    Dobb, Geoffrey
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Martin, Greg S.
    Ramsay, Graham
    Silva, Eliezer
    Sprung, Charles L.
    Vallet, Benoit
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    Costigan, Timothy M.
    Leishman, Amy G.
    Williams, Mark D.
    Reinhart, Konrad
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 14 (03)
  • [9] Plasma cytokine levels predict response to corticosteroids in septic shock
    Bentzer, Peter
    Fjell, Chris
    Walley, Keith R.
    Boyd, John
    Russell, James A.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (12) : 1970 - 1979
  • [10] Reversal of late septic shock with supraphysiologic doses of hydrocortisone
    Bollaert, PE
    Charpentier, C
    Levy, B
    Debouverie, M
    Audibert, G
    Larcan, A
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) : 645 - 650