Comparison of two optical biometric devices for intraocular lens calculation

被引:2
作者
Uckmann, M. -S. [1 ]
Stattin, M. [2 ]
Zehetner, C. [3 ]
Neururer, S. [4 ]
Speicher, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Klin Augenheilkunde, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Rudolfstiftung Wien, Augenabt, Juchgasse 25, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Abt Augenheilkunde & Optometrie, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Med Univ Innsbruck, Abt Med Stat, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGE | 2019年 / 116卷 / 03期
关键词
IOLMaster500; LenStarLS900; Optical biometry; Predicted refractive error; PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; POWER CALCULATION; HOFFER-Q; IOL-MASTER; ACCURACY; TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; FORMULA; SRK/T;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-018-0655-7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundModern cataract surgery not only consists of aminimally invasive lens extraction but also of the implantation of asuitable intraocular lens.ObjectiveThe aim of this prospective trial was acomparison of the predicted refractive error of two optical biometers, the IOLMaster500 and LenStar LS 900 for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery.Material and methodsThis was aprospective, analytical, comparative, non-masked study. A total of 86 eyes of 86patients were examined and measured with both instruments before and after uneventful cataract surgery. Primary outcome measures were the differences of the predicted refractive error of both instruments. The predicted refractive error was calculated with different formulas. The results were compared to each other, to the desired target refraction as well as to the postoperative spherical equivalent.ResultsThe mean differences in predicted refractive error of both instruments varied between 0.9 +/- 0.19 (standard deviation) diopters(D) and 0.18 +/- 0.30D depending on the chosen formula. The IOLMaster500 predicted less difference to the desired target refraction as well as to the spherical equivalent than the LenStarLS900 with nearly all formulas.ConclusionBoth devices generated reproducible exact data with only asmall deviation from the desired target refraction and from the postoperative spherical equivalent. There were statistically significant differences based on the chosen a-constants as well as the utilized measurement methods of both instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry [J].
Aristodemou, Petros ;
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox ;
Sparrow, John M. ;
Johnston, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (01) :63-71
[2]   Assessment of Anterior Chamber Depth Using Visante Optical Coherence Tomography, Slitlamp Optical Coherence Tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan IIz [J].
Dinc, Umut Asli ;
Gorgun, Ebru ;
Oncel, Banu ;
Yenerel, Melda Nursal ;
Alimgil, Levent .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 224 (06) :341-346
[3]   Partial coherence interferometry: A novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery [J].
Drexler, W ;
Findl, O ;
Menapace, R ;
Rainer, G ;
Vass, C ;
Hitzenberger, CK ;
Fercher, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 126 (04) :524-534
[4]   EYE-LENGTH MEASUREMENT BY INTERFEROMETRY WITH PARTIALLY COHERENT-LIGHT [J].
FERCHER, AF ;
MENGEDOHT, K ;
WERNER, W .
OPTICS LETTERS, 1988, 13 (03) :186-188
[5]   Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis [J].
Haigis, W ;
Lege, B ;
Miller, N ;
Schneider, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) :765-773
[6]  
Haigis W, 2012, ACTA CLIN CROAT, V51, P59
[7]   Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery [J].
Hilford, D. ;
Hilford, M. ;
Mathew, A. ;
Polkinghorne, P. J. .
EYE, 2009, 23 (06) :1388-1392
[8]   Predicting the Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position Using Continuous Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements [J].
Hirnschall, Nino ;
Amir-Asgari, Sahand ;
Maedel, Sophie ;
Findl, Oliver .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (08) :5196-5203
[9]   Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Shammas, H. John ;
Savini, Giacomo .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (04) :644-648