Examining the interaction between bodily pain and mental health of construction workers

被引:34
作者
Turner, Michelle [1 ]
Lingard, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Bodily pain; mental health; musculoskeletal pain; work ability; well-being; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; EARLY RETIREMENT; ABILITY; PROMOTION; STRESS; PERSPECTIVES; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; DISABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2020.1791920
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Construction work is physically demanding, and incidences of physical injury and work disability are high. This study explores musculoskeletal bodily pain and the impact this has on construction workers' mental health. A mixed-method approach incorporated survey and interview data. Sixty-seven construction workers completed a survey consisting of work ability and mental health measures. Eighteen workers who completed a survey participated in an interview exploring the occurrence and management of body pain, and the impact of pain on mental health. Survey findings indicated that participants whose pain had originated from work had significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress severity. Findings also revealed that depression, anxiety, and stress had a negative relationship with work ability indicators, suggesting that work ability is likely to decline when workers experience poor mental health. Key themes emerging from the interview data comprised of the expectation of pain, managing pain, impact of pain on mental health, pressure to work with pain, work ability and planning for the future, and the stigma of mental health. A conceptual model is presented which illustrates the relationship between work tasks, pain, mental health, and work ability. The model identifies that anticipated and experienced bodily pain creates harmful psychological demands for workers which impacts on their mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1023
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [51] 2-Q
  • [52] Integrated Worker Health Protection and Promotion Programs Overview and Perspectives on Health and Economic Outcomes
    Pronk, Nicolaas P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 55 (12) : S30 - S37
  • [53] The NIOSH Total Worker Health™ Program An Overview
    Schill, Anita L.
    Chosewood, Lewis Casey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 55 (12) : S8 - S11
  • [54] Psychometric Evaluation and Normative Data for the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Nonclinical Sample of U.S. Adults
    Sinclair, Samuel Justin
    Siefert, Caleb J.
    Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle M.
    Stein, Michelle B.
    Renna, Megan
    Blais, Mark A.
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 35 (03) : 259 - 279
  • [55] Preventing Chronic Disease in the Workplace: A Workshop Report and Recommendations
    Sorensen, Glorian
    Landsbergis, Paul
    Hammer, Leslie
    Amick, Benjamin C., III
    Linnan, Laura
    Yancey, Antronette
    Welch, Laura S.
    Goetzel, Ron Z.
    Flannery, Kelly M.
    Pratt, Charlotte
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 101 : S196 - S207
  • [56] Occupation, work environment, and disability pension:: A prospective study of construction workers
    Stattin, M
    Järvholm, B
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 33 (02) : 84 - 90
  • [57] The incidence of medically reported work-related ill health in the UK construction industry
    Stocks, S. J.
    McNamee, R.
    Carder, M.
    Agius, R. M.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 67 (08) : 574 - 576
  • [58] Total Worker Health® 2014-2018: The Novel Approach to Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being Evolves
    Tamers, Sara L.
    Chosewood, L. Casey
    Childress, Adele
    Hudson, Heidi
    Nigam, Jeannie
    Chang, Chia-Chia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (03)
  • [59] The Concept of Work Ability
    Tengland, Per-Anders
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 21 (02) : 275 - 285
  • [60] A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data
    Thomas, David R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2006, 27 (02) : 237 - 246