A structural damage detection indicator based on principal component analysis and statistical hypothesis testing

被引:59
作者
Mujica, L. E. [1 ]
Ruiz, M. [1 ]
Pozo, F. [1 ]
Rodellar, J. [1 ,2 ]
Gueemes, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Catalunya BarcelonaTech UPC, EUETIB, CoDAlab4, Dept Matemat Aplicada III, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Catalunya BarcelonaTech UPC, ETSECCPB, CoDAlab4, Dept Matemat Aplicada III, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain
[3] UPM, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Aeronaut, Ctr Composites Mat & Smart Struct, Madrid, Spain
关键词
damage detection; PCA; hypothesis testing; structural health monitoring; IDENTIFICATION; FAULT;
D O I
10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025014
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
A comprehensive statistical analysis is performed for structural health monitoring (SHM). The analysis starts by obtaining the baseline principal component analysis (PCA) model and projections using measurements from the healthy or undamaged structure. PCA is used in this framework as a way to compress and extract information from the sensor-data stored for the structure which summarizes most of the variance in a few (new) variables into the baseline model space. When the structure needs to be inspected, new experiments are performed and they are projected into the baseline PCA model. Each experiment is considered as a random process and, consequently, each projection into the PCA model is treated as a random variable. Then, using a random sample of a limited number of experiments on the healthy structure, it can be inferred using the chi(2) test that the population or baseline projection is normally distributed with mean mu(h) and standard deviation sigma(h). The objective is then to analyse whether the distribution of samples that come from the current structure (healthy or not) is related to the healthy one. More precisely, a test for the equality of population means is performed with a random sample, that is, the equality of the sample mean mu(s) and the population mean mu(h) is tested. The results of the test can determine that the hypothesis is rejected (mu(h) not equal mu(c) and the structure is damaged) or that there is no evidence to suggest that the two means are different, so the structure can be considered as healthy. The results indicate that the test is able to accurately classify random samples as healthy or not.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
DeGroot M. H., 2012, PROBABILITY STAT PEA
[2]   Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring [J].
Farrar, Charles R. ;
Lieven, Nick A. J. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851) :623-632
[3]   An introduction to structural health monitoring [J].
Farrar, Charles R. ;
Worden, Keith .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851) :303-315
[4]  
Farrar Charles R, 2012, Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective
[5]   Vibration-based structural damage identification [J].
Farrar, CR ;
Doebling, SW ;
Nix, DA .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2001, 359 (1778) :131-149
[6]  
Fassois S.D., 2009, Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, P443
[7]   Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures [J].
Fassois, Spilios D. ;
Sakellariou, John S. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851) :411-448
[8]  
Kullaa J, 2012, P 6 EUR WORKSH STRUC, P1
[9]   Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring [J].
Kullaa, Jyrki .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 25 (08) :2976-2989
[10]   Feature Extraction and Sensor Fusion for Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring Under Changing Environmental Conditions [J].
Lu, Yinghui ;
Michaels, Jennifer E. .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (11) :1462-1471