Methane production and diurnal variation measured in dairy cows and predicted from fermentation pattern and nutrient or carbon flow

被引:47
作者
Brask, M. [1 ]
Weisbjerg, M. R. [1 ]
Hellwing, A. L. F. [1 ]
Bannink, A. [2 ]
Lund, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Anim Sci, AU Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
modelling methane; VFA; enteric fermentation; carbon; dairy cow; VOLATILE FATTY-ACIDS; RUMEN FERMENTATION; EMISSIONS; DIGESTION; SUPPLEMENTATION; METHANOGENESIS; METABOLISM; RUMINANTS; RAPESEED; SILAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S1751731115001184
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Many feeding trials have been conducted to quantify enteric methane (CH4) production in ruminants. Although a relationship between diet composition, rumen fermentation and CH4 production is generally accepted, the efforts to quantify this relationship within the same experiment remain scarce. In the present study, a data set was compiled from the results of three intensive respiration chamber trials with lactating rumen and intestinal fistulated Holstein cows, including measurements of rumen and intestinal digestion, rumen fermentation parameters and CH4 production. Two approaches were used to calculate CH4 from observations: (1) a rumen organic matter (OM) balance was derived from OM intake and duodenal organic matter flow (DOM) distinguishing various nutrients and (2) a rumen carbon balance was derived from carbon intake and duodenal carbon flow (DCARB). Duodenal flow was corrected for endogenous matter, and contribution of fermentation in the large intestine was accounted for. Hydrogen (H-2) arising from fermentation was calculated using the fermentation pattern measured in rumen fluid. CH4 was calculated from H-2 production corrected for H-2 use with biohydrogenation of fatty acids. The DOM model overestimated CH4/kg dry matter intake (DMI) by 6.1% (R-2 = 0.36) and the DCARB model underestimated CH4/kg DMI by 0.4% (R-2 = 0.43). A stepwise regression of the difference between measured and calculated daily CH4 production was conducted to examine explanations for the deviance. Dietary carbohydrate composition and rumen carbohydrate digestion were the main sources of inaccuracies for both models. Furthermore, differences were related to rumen ammonia concentration with the DOM model and to rumen pH and dietary fat with the DCARB model. Adding these parameters to the models and performing a multiple regression against observed daily CH4 production resulted in R-2 of 0.66 and 0.72 for DOM and DCARB models, respectively. The diurnal pattern of CH4 production followed that of rumen volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and the CH4 to CO2 production ratio, but was inverse to rumen pH and the rumen hydrogen balance calculated from 4 x (acetate + butyrate)/2 x (propionate + valerate). In conclusion, the amount of feed fermented was the most important factor determining variations in CH4 production between animals, diets and during the day. Interactions between feed components, VFA absorption rates and variation between animals seemed to be factors that were complicating the accurate prediction of CH4. Using a ruminal carbon balance appeared to predict CH4 production just as well as calculations based on rumen digestion of individual nutrients.
引用
收藏
页码:1795 / 1806
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Rumen simulation technique study on the interactions of dietary lauric and myristic acid supplementation in suppressing ruminal methanogenesis [J].
Soliva, CR ;
Meile, L ;
Cieslak, A ;
Kreuzer, M ;
Machmüller, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2004, 92 (04) :689-700
[42]   Effects of particle size and dry matter content of a total mixed ration on intraruminal equilibration and net portal flux of volatile fatty acids in lactating dairy cows [J].
Storm, A. C. ;
Kristensen, N. B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (09) :4223-4238
[43]   Diurnal variation in fatty acid profiles in rumen digesta from dairy cows grazing high-quality pasture [J].
Sun, X. Q. ;
Gibbs, S. J. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 177 (3-4) :152-160
[44]  
Thode S, 1999, 127 DJF INT
[45]  
Van Soest PJ., 1994, Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, V2, DOI 10.7591/9781501732355
[46]   Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep [J].
van Zijderveld, S. M. ;
Gerrits, W. J. J. ;
Apajalahti, J. A. ;
Newbold, J. R. ;
Dijkstra, J. ;
Leng, R. A. ;
Perdok, H. B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (12) :5856-5866
[47]   Hydrolysis and fermentation rate of glucose, sucrose and lactose in the rumen [J].
Weisbjerg, MR ;
Hvelplund, T ;
Bibby, BM .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1998, 48 (01) :12-18
[48]  
WEISBJERG MR, 1992, ACTA AGR SCAND A-AN, V42, P106, DOI 10.1080/09064709209410121
[49]   Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters [J].
Yan, T. ;
Porter, M. G. ;
Mayne, C. S. .
ANIMAL, 2009, 3 (10) :1455-1462
[50]   A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR PURINE MEASUREMENT AND ITS USE FOR ESTIMATING NET RUMINAL PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS [J].
ZINN, RA ;
OWENS, FN .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1986, 66 (01) :157-166