Evaluation of on-line trading systems: Markov-switching vs time-varying parameter models

被引:6
作者
Fornaciari, Michele [1 ]
Grillenzoni, Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ IUAV Venice, Venice, Italy
关键词
Gain maximization; Maximum likelihood; Recursive least squares; Standard and Poor index; State probabilities; Sequential analysis; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Automatic trading systems, to support the decisions of investors in financial markets, are increasingly used nowadays. Such systems process data on-line and provide signals of buy and sell in correspondence of pits and peaks of the market. Real-time detection of turning points in financial time series is a challenging issue and can only be performed with sequential methods. This paper considers non-linear and non-stationary dynamic models used in statistics and econometrics, and evaluates their performance. In particular, it compares Markov switching (MS) regression and time-varying parameter (TVP) methods; the latter extend moving-average (MA) techniques which are widely used by traders. The novel approach of this paper is to select the coefficients of the detection methods by optimizing the profit objective functions of the trading activity, using statistical estimates as initial values. The paper also develops a sequential approach, based on sliding windows, to cope with the time-variability of MS coefficients. An extensive application to the daily Standard & Poor 500 index (the world's leading indicator of stock values) in the period 1999-2015, provides evidence in favor of models with a few parameters. This seems a natural consequence of the complexity of the gain maximization problem, which usually admits multiple local solutions. Directions for further research are represented by multivariate detection methods and the development of recursive algorithms for gain optimization. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Trading team composition for the intraday multistock market [J].
Alvim, Leandro G. M. ;
Milidiu, Ruy L. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2013, 54 (02) :838-845
[2]   Regime Changes and Financial Markets [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Timmermann, Allan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :313-337
[3]   Markov-switching asset allocation: Do profitable strategies exist [J].
Bulla J. ;
Mergner S. ;
Bulla I. ;
Sesboüé A. ;
Chesneau C. .
Journal of Asset Management, 2011, 12 (5) :310-321
[4]  
Chen R., 2010, TURNING POINTS DETEC
[5]   Evidence of feedback trading with Markov switching regimes [J].
Dean W.G. ;
Faff R.W. .
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2008, 30 (2) :133-151
[6]   Can Markov switching models replicate chartist profits in the foreign exchange market? [J].
Dewachter, H .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2001, 20 (01) :25-41
[7]   Can Markov switching models predict excess foreign exchange returns? [J].
Dueker, Michael ;
Neely, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2007, 31 (02) :279-296
[8]  
Granger C.W.J., 2011, MODELLING NONLINEAR
[9]  
Granger CWJ, 2008, STUD NONLINEAR DYN E, V12
[10]   Sequential smoothing for turning point detection with application to financial decisions [J].
Grillenzoni, Carlo .
APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2014, 30 (02) :132-140