The magnetic anal sphincter in faecal incontinence: is initial success sustained over time?

被引:30
作者
Barussaud, M. -L. [1 ]
Mantoo, S. [2 ]
Wyart, V. [2 ]
Meurette, G. [2 ]
Lehur, P. -A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Poitiers, Serv Chirurg Digest, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Hosp Nantes, Inst Malad Appareil Digest, Clin Chirurg Digest & Endocrinienne, Nantes, France
关键词
Faecal incontinence; magnetic anal sphincter; device; follow-up; success rate; SACRAL NERVE-STIMULATION; AUGMENTATION; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/codi.12423
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim In the short term, implantation of a magnetic anal sphincter (MAS) is a safe and effective treatment for faecal incontinence (FI). In this paper we show that the initial results stand the test of time and patient satisfaction remains high in the medium term. Method Data on 23 women [median age 64 (35-78) years] implanted with a MAS device between December 2008 and September 2012 were reviewed from a prospective database. Assessment was based on significant improvement of incontinence scores - the Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Severity (CCF-IS) score, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) score - and patient satisfaction at 6, 12, 24 and 36months after surgery. Results The device was removed in two patients owing to complications. Median follow-up was 17.6months. The median preoperative CCF-IS score was 15.2 and fell to 6.9, 7.7, 7.8 and 5.3 at 6, 12, 24 and 36months, respectively. The median FIQoL score significantly (P<0.001) improved from 1.97 preoperatively to 3.19, 3.11, 2.92 and 2.93, respectively, at the same time periods. The concordance of the CCF-IS and FIQoL scores was 91%. Sixteen of the 23 patients were satisfied but only 14 would have recommended the MAS to someone else. Lack of improvement was the main reason for dissatisfaction. Conclusion Good initial results tend to remain stable over time and about two-thirds of patients are satisfied after MAS implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1503
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [11] Validation of the French version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life (FIQL) scale
    Rullier, E
    Zerbib, F
    Marrel, A
    Amouretti, M
    Lehur, PA
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2004, 28 (6-7): : 562 - 568
  • [12] Evolving therapy for fecal incontinence
    Tan, Jane J. Y.
    Chan, Miranda
    Tjandra, Joe J.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (11) : 1950 - 1967
  • [13] Infection Rates in a Large Investigational Trial of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence
    Wexner, Steven D.
    Hull, Tracy
    Edden, Yair
    Coller, John A.
    Devroede, Ghislain
    McCallum, Richard
    Chan, Miranda
    Ayscue, Jennifer M.
    Shobeiri, Abbas S.
    Margolin, David
    England, Michael
    Kaufman, Howard
    Snape, William J.
    Mutlu, Ece
    Chua, Heidi
    Pettit, Paul
    Nagle, Deborah
    Madoff, Robert D.
    Lerew, Darin R.
    Mellgren, Anders
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (07) : 1081 - 1088
  • [14] Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence?
    Wong, M. T. C.
    Meurette, G.
    Wyart, V.
    Lehur, P. -A.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (06) : E323 - E329
  • [15] The Magnetic Anal Sphincter Versus the Artificial Bowel Sphincter: a Comparison of 2 Treatments for Fecal Incontinence
    Wong, Mark T. C.
    Meurette, Guillaume
    Stangherlin, Pierre
    Lehur, Paul-Antoine
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (07) : 773 - 779
  • [16] Outcome and Management of Patients in Whom Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence Failed
    Wong, Mark T. C.
    Meurette, Guillaume
    Rodat, Francois
    Regenet, Nicolas
    Wyart, Vincent
    Lehur, Paul-Antoine
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (04) : 425 - 432