Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research

被引:214
作者
Ghezzi, Antonio [1 ]
Gabelloni, Donata [2 ]
Martini, Antonella [2 ]
Natalicchio, Angelo [3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Via Lambruschini 4B, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, DESTEC, Lgo L Lazzarino 2, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
[3] Politecn Bari, Dept Mech Math & Management, Viale Japigia 182-B, I-70126 Bari, Italy
关键词
OPEN INNOVATION; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; BUSINESS MODELS; IDEAS; PARTICIPATION; QUALITY; CROWD; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1111/ijmr.12135
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As academic and practitioner studies on crowdsourcing have been building up since 2006, the subject itself has progressively gained in importance within the broad field of management. No systematic review on the topic has so far appeared in management journals, however; moreover, the field suffers from ambiguity in the topic's definition, which in turn has led to its largely unstructured evolution. The authors therefore investigate the existing body of knowledge on crowdsourcing systematically through a penetrating review in which the strengths and weakness of this literature stream are presented clearly and then future avenues of research are set out. The review is based on 121 scientific articles published between January 2006 and January 2015. The review recognizes that crowdsourcing is ingrained in two mainstream disciplines within the broader subject matter of innovation and management: (1) open innovation; and (2) co-creation. The review, in addition, also touches on several issues covered in other theoretical streams: (3) information systems management; (4) organizational theory and design; (5) marketing; and (6) strategy. The authors adopt a process perspective, applying the Input-Process-Output' framework to interpret research on crowdsourcing within the broad lines of: (1) Input (Problem/Task); (2) Process (session management; problem management; knowledge management; technology); and (3) Outcome (solution/completed task; seekers' benefits; solvers' benefits). This framework provides a detailed description of how the topic has evolved over time, and suggestions concerning the future direction of research are proposed in the form of research questions that are valuable for both academics and managers.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 363
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]   Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review [J].
Adams, Richard ;
Jeanrenaud, Sally ;
Bessant, John ;
Denyer, David ;
Overy, Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2016, 18 (02) :180-205
[2]   Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies [J].
Adams, Richard J. ;
Smart, Palie ;
Huff, Anne Sigismund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) :432-454
[3]   Value Capture and Crowdsourcing [J].
Afuah, Allan ;
Tucci, Christopher L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (03) :457-460
[4]   CROWDSOURCING AS A SOLUTION TO DISTANT SEARCH [J].
Afuah, Allan ;
Tucci, Christopher L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (03) :355-375
[5]  
Ågerfalk PJ, 2008, MIS QUART, V32, P385
[6]  
Alam S.A., 2013, P AM C INF SYST LIM, V4, P2902
[7]  
Ali Acar O., 2011, DIM DRUID AC WINT C
[8]   Using crowdsourcing for TREC relevance assessment [J].
Alonso, Omar ;
Mizzaro, Stefano .
INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 48 (06) :1053-1066
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 33 INT C INF SYST
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MCKINSEY GLOB I