Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Bariatric Surgery Candidates

被引:37
作者
Hall, Brian J. [1 ]
Hood, Megan M. [2 ]
Nackers, Lisa M. [3 ]
Azarbad, Leila
Ivan, Iulia [4 ]
Corsica, Joyce [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Mental Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Dept Behav Sci, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Palo Alto Univ, Dept Psychol, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
obesity; depression; Beck Depression Inventory-II; confirmatory factor analysis; bariatric assessment; WEIGHT-LOSS SURGERY; EDITION BDI-II; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSES; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; MORBID-OBESITY; FIT INDEXES; INDIVIDUALS; UTILITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1037/a0030305
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Screening for depression is an integral part of psychological evaluations conducted prior to bariatric surgery. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is the most commonly used measure of depression in these treatment evaluations. The reliability and validity of the BDI-II has not yet been evaluated within bariatric surgery-seeking samples, evidencing a significant gap in the present literature. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the structural validity of the BDI-II and to examine the reliability and convergent and criterion validity of this instrument within a bariatric surgery-seeking sample. The study population consisted of 505 ethnically diverse bariatric surgery candidates presenting for presurgical psychological evaluations in a midwestern urban academic medical center. Confirmatory factor analytic results indicated that a 3-factor model consisting of affective, cognitive, and somatic factors was the best fitting model of depression within this sample. Internal consistency reliability was satisfactory for each subscale, ranging from .72 to .82. Moderate to large correlations were observed between each BDI-II subscale and a measure of depression previously validated with bariatric surgery candidates indicating adequate convergent validity. On the basis of clinical interview, 14% of the sample was diagnosed with current major depression. Significant mean differences were observed between depressed and nondepressed patients with respect to each BDI-II subscale score, demonstrating criterion-related validity. The BDI-II is a reliable and valid measure of depression for bariatric surgery candidates. Understanding the factor structure of the BDI-II can be useful for planning potential presurgical psychological interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 299
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, WHO TECHN REP SER, V894, pi, DOI DOI 10.1596/0-1952-1129-4
  • [3] Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients
    Arnau, RC
    Meagher, MW
    Norris, MP
    Bramson, R
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [4] Psychosocial evaluation of bariatric surgery candidates: A survey of present practices
    Bauchowitz, AU
    Gonder-Frederick, LA
    Olbrisch, ME
    Azarbad, L
    Ryee, MY
    Woodson, M
    Miller, A
    Schirmer, B
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2005, 67 (05): : 825 - 832
  • [5] Beck A.T., 1996, Manual for the BDI-II, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00742-000
  • [6] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION
    BECK, AT
    STEER, RA
    GARBIN, MG
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) : 77 - 100
  • [7] FIT INDEXES, LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS, CONSTRAINT CHANGES AND INCOMPLETE DATA IN STRUCTURAL MODELS
    BENTLER, PM
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1990, 25 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [8] BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • [9] Browne M. W., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • [10] A psychometric evaluation of the BDI-II in treatment-seeking substance abusers
    Buckley, TC
    Parker, JD
    Heggie, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2001, 20 (03) : 197 - 204