A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals

被引:160
作者
Hedges, Larry V. [1 ]
Pustejovsky, James E. [1 ]
Shadish, William R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Stat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Univ Calif, Psychol Sci, Merced, CA USA
关键词
multiple baseline designs; effect size; hierarchical linear model; single-case design; SINGLE-CASE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1086
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Single-case designs are a class of research methods for evaluating treatment effects by measuring outcomes repeatedly over time while systematically introducing different condition (e.g., treatment and control) to the same individual. The designs are used across fields such as behavior analysis, clinical psychology, special education, and medicine. Emerging standards for single-case designs have focused attention on methods for summarizing and meta-analyzing findings and on the need for effect sizes indices that are comparable to those used in between-subjects designs. In the previous work, we discussed how to define and estimate an effect size that is directly comparable to the standardized mean difference often used in between-subjects research based on the data from a particular type of single-case design, the treatment reversal or (AB)(k) design. This paper extends the effect size measure to another type of single-case study, the multiple baseline design. We propose estimation methods for the effect size and its variance, study the estimators using simulation, and demonstrate the approach in two applications. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 341
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Busk P.L., 1992, SINGLE CASE RES DESI
  • [12] METAANALYSIS FOR SINGLE-CASE CONSULTATION OUTCOMES - APPLICATIONS TO RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
    BUSSE, RT
    KRATOCHWILL, TR
    ELLIOTT, SN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 33 (04) : 269 - 285
  • [13] Repeated Reading Interventions for Students With Learning Disabilities: Status of the Evidence
    Chard, David J.
    Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.
    Baker, Scott K.
    Doabler, Christian
    Apichatabutra, Chanisa
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2009, 75 (03) : 263 - 281
  • [14] Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs
    Fisher, WW
    Kelley, ME
    Lomas, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2003, 36 (03) : 387 - 406
  • [15] N-of-1 Trials in the Medical Literature A Systematic Review
    Gabler, Nicole B.
    Duan, Naihua
    Vohra, Sunita
    Kravitz, Richard L.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (08) : 761 - 768
  • [16] THE N-OF-1 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL - CLINICAL USEFULNESS OUR 3-YEAR EXPERIENCE
    GUYATT, GH
    KELLER, JL
    JAESCHKE, R
    ROSENBLOOM, D
    ADACHI, JD
    NEWHOUSE, MT
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [17] Hedges L. V., 1981, J EDUC STAT, V6, P107, DOI [10.3102/10769986006002107, DOI 10.2307/1164588]
  • [18] Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs
    Hedges, Larry V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2007, 32 (04) : 341 - 370
  • [19] A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Pustejovsky, James E.
    Shadish, William R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (03) : 224 - 239
  • [20] What Are Effect Sizes and Why Do We Need Them?
    Hedges, Larry V.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 2 (03) : 167 - 171