Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

被引:116
作者
Lincoln, N. B. [2 ]
Radford, K. A. [1 ]
Game, F. L. [1 ]
Jeffcoate, W. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Hosp Trust, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Foot Ulcer Trials Unit, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Inst Work Hlth & Org, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
behaviour; diabetes; education; foot; ulcer;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-008-1110-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims/hypothesis This observer-blind, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effect of a foot care education programme in the secondary prevention of foot ulcers. Methods People with newly healed foot ulcers attending one of three specialist clinics were allocated to receive either targeted, one-to-one education or usual care, using a computer-generated random allocation sequence that had been prepared in advance but which was concealed from the clinical researcher. The primary outcome was ulcer incidence at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were ulcer incidence at 6 months and incidence of amputation, mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and quality of life (Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale) at 6 and 12 months. Protective foot care behaviours (Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare) were assessed at 12 months. Results There were 87 (mean [SD] age 63.5 [12.1] years) patients in the intervention group and 85 control patients (mean [SD] age 64.9 [10.9] years). The groups were comparable at baseline. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between groups in ulcer incidence at either 6 months (intervention 30%, control 21%) or 12 months (intervention 41%, control 41%). Recommended foot care behaviours at 12 months were better in the intervention than in the control group (p=0.03), but education had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on mood, quality of life or amputations. Conclusions/interpretation Even though the intervention was associated with improved foot care behaviour, there was no evidence that this programme of targeted education was associated with clinical benefit in this population when compared with usual care. The usefulness and optimal delivery of education to such a high-risk group requires further evaluation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00729456.
引用
收藏
页码:1954 / 1961
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abetz L, 2002, Practical Diabetes International, V19, P167, DOI [10.1002/pdi.356, DOI 10.1002/PDI.356]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DIABETES CARE, DOI DOI 10.2337/DC07-S004
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT CONS DIAB FOOT
[4]   LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS FOR DIABETIC-PATIENTS WITH FOOT ULCERS [J].
APELQVIST, J ;
LARSSON, J ;
AGARDH, CD .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 233 (06) :485-491
[5]   Validation of a diabetic wound classification system - The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA ;
Harkless, LB .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (05) :855-859
[6]   Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF) [J].
Bann, CM ;
Fehnel, SE ;
Gagnon, DD .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2003, 21 (17) :1277-1290
[7]   RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DIABETIC PATIENT EDUCATION - IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT IMPROVED METABOLIC STATUS [J].
BLOOMGARDEN, ZT ;
KARMALLY, W ;
METZGER, MJ ;
BROTHERS, M ;
NECHEMIAS, C ;
BOOKMAN, J ;
FAIERMAN, D ;
GINSBERGFELLNER, F ;
RAYFIELD, E ;
BROWN, WV .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (03) :263-272
[8]   The global burden of diabetic foot disease [J].
Boulton, AJM ;
Vileikyte, L ;
Ragnarson-Tennvall, G ;
Apelqvist, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1719-1724
[9]   Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers [J].
Cavanagh, PR ;
Lipsky, BA ;
Bradbury, AW ;
Botek, G .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1725-1735
[10]   Long-term effects of one year of intensified pediatric activities on foot-care knowledge and self-care habits in patients with diabetes [J].
Hämäläinen, H ;
Rönnemaa, T ;
Toikka, T ;
Liukkonen, I .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1998, 24 (06) :734-740