Relationship of Barthel Index and its Short Form with the Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke patients

被引:104
作者
Liu, Fang [1 ]
Tsang, Raymond C. C. [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
Zhou, Mingchao [1 ]
Zha, Fubing [1 ]
Long, Jianjun [1 ]
Wang, Yulong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Rehabil,Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] MacLehose Med Rehabil Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Stroke; Modified Rankin Scale; Barthel Index; Assessment; RELIABILITY; THROMBOLYSIS; OCCLUSION; OUTCOMES; DAY-7; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105033
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index are the most common scales for assessing stroke outcomes in clinical practice and trials. Concordance between the Barthel Index scores and the modified Rankin Scale grades is important to define favorable outcome in clinical practice and stroke trials consistently. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the scores of Barthel Index and 3-item Barthel Index Short Form with the modified Rankin Scale grades of acute stroke patients. Methods: Barthel Index, Barthel Index Short Form scores and modified Rankin Scale grades of 516 stroke patients were obtained from a follow-up study of the Longshi Scale in China. A study showed that the assignment of modified Rankin Scale grades to stroke patients was prone to misclassification. Therefore, the recorded modified Rankin Scale grades were compared with the Barthel Index scores of each patient to produce the adjusted modified Rankin Scale grades. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were performed to determine the optimal cutoff scores, respective sensitivities and specificities of Barthel Index and Barthel Index Short Form with the corresponding adjusted modified Rankin Scale grades <= 1, <= 2 and <= 3. Findings: About 44% of the recorded modified Rankin Scale grades of patients required adjustment. The optimal cutoff scores were >= 100 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.3%), >= 100 (sensitivity 98.1%; specificity 100%) and >= 75 (sensitivity 93.8%; specificity, 91.9%) for the Barthel Index and >= 40 (sensitivity 100%; specificity 78.9%), >= 40 (sensitivity 98.1%; specificity 82.8%), and >= 35 (sensitivity 99.3%; specificity, 91.6%) for the Barthel Index Short Form corresponding to the adjusted modified Rankin Scale grade <= 1, <= 2, and <= 3 respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were nearly all above 0.9. Conclusions: The optimal cutoff scores of Barthel Index and Barthel Index Short Form corresponding to the modified Rankin Scale grades <= 1, <= 2 and <= 3 were recommended to be >= 100 and >= 40, >= 100 and >= 40, and >= 75 and >= 35 respectively for determining the favorable and unfavorable outcome of stroke patients within three months of onset in clinical practice and trials.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, STROKE, DOI DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.503870
  • [2] Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials - A literature review and synthesis
    Banks, Jamie L.
    Marotta, Charles A.
    [J]. STROKE, 2007, 38 (03) : 1091 - 1096
  • [3] Day-7 or day-90 modified Rankin scale score: what is the best measure of outcome after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke?
    Bugnicourt, Jean-Marc
    Godefroy, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2013, 36 (03) : 316 - 316
  • [4] Day-7 modified Rankin Scale score as the best measure of the thrombolysis direct effect on stroke?
    Cappellari, Manuel
    Moretto, Giuseppe
    Bovi, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2013, 36 (03) : 314 - 315
  • [5] Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Hacke, Werner
    Furlan, Anthony J.
    Al-Rawi, Yasir
    Davalos, Antoni
    Fiebach, Jochen B.
    Gruber, Franz
    Kaste, Markku
    Lipka, Leslie J.
    Pedraza, Salvador
    Ringleb, Peter A.
    Rowley, Howard A.
    Schneider, Dietmar
    Schwamm, Lee H.
    Leal, Joaquin Serena
    Soehngen, Mariola
    Teal, Phil A.
    Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, Karin
    Wintermark, Max
    Warach, Steven
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2009, 8 (02) : 141 - 150
  • [6] Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations
    Harrison, Jennifer K.
    McArthur, Katherine S.
    Quinn, Terence J.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2013, 8 : 201 - 211
  • [7] Short- and longer-term health-care resource utilization and costs associated with acute ischemic stroke
    Johnson, Barbara H.
    Bonafede, Machaon M.
    Watson, Crystal
    [J]. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 8 : 53 - 61
  • [8] Determining the cut-off score for the Modified Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for assessment of functional independence and residual disability after stroke
    Lee, Seung Yeol
    Kim, Deog Young
    Sohn, Min Kyun
    Lee, Jongmin
    Lee, Sam-Gyu
    Shin, Yong-Il
    Kim, Soo-Yeon
    Oh, Gyung-Jae
    Lee, Young Hoon
    Lee, Yang-Soo
    Joo, Min Cheol
    Lee, So Young
    Ahn, Jeonghoon
    Chang, Won Hyuk
    Choi, Ji Yoo
    Kang, Sung Hyun
    Kim, Il Yoel
    Han, Junhee
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [9] Use of a 3-Item Short-Form Version of the Barthel Index for Use in Stroke: Systematic Review and External Validation
    MacIsaac, Rachael L.
    Ali, Myzoon
    Taylor-Rowan, Martin
    Rodgers, Helen
    Lees, Kennedy R.
    Quinn, Terence J.
    [J]. STROKE, 2017, 48 (03) : 618 - 623
  • [10] Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Middleton, Sandy
    McElduff, Patrick
    Ward, Jeanette
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Dale, Simeon
    D'Este, Catherine
    Drury, Peta
    Griffiths, Rhonda
    Cheung, N. Wah
    Quinn, Clare
    Evans, Malcolm
    Cadilhac, Dominique
    Levi, Christopher
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) : 1699 - 1706