Use of quantitative SPECT/CT reconstruction in 99mTc-sestamibi imaging of patients with renal masses

被引:15
作者
Jones, Krystyna M. [1 ]
Solnes, Lilja B. [1 ]
Rowe, Steven P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gorin, Michael A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sheikhbahaei, Sara [1 ]
Fung, George [1 ]
Frey, Eric C. [1 ]
Allaf, Mohamad E. [2 ,3 ]
Du, Yong [1 ]
Javadi, Mehrbod S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
Quantitative; SPECT; RCC; Sestamibi; Oncocytoma; RISING INCIDENCE; COMPENSATION; BIOPSY; DIFFERENTIATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-017-1222-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Technetium-99m (Tc-99m)-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has previously been shown to allow for the accurate differentiation of benign renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors (HOCTs) apart from other malignant renal tumor histologies, with oncocytomas/HOCTs showing high uptake and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) showing low uptake based on uptake ratios from non-quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstructions. However, in this study, several tumors fell close to the uptake ratio cutoff, likely due to limitations in conventional SPECT/CT reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that application of quantitative SPECT/CT (QSPECT) reconstruction methods developed by our group would provide more robust separation of hot and cold lesions, serving as an imaging framework on which quantitative biomarkers can be validated for evaluation of renal masses with Tc-99m-sestamibi. Single-photon emission computed tomography data were reconstructed using the clinical Flash 3D reconstruction and QSPECT methods. Two blinded readers then characterized each tumor as hot or cold. Semi-quantitative uptake ratios were calculated by dividing lesion activity by background renal activity for both Flash 3D and QSPECT reconstructions. The difference between median (mean) hot and cold tumor uptake ratios measured 0.655 (0.73) with the QSPECT method and 0.624 (0.67) with the conventional method, resulting in increased separation between hot and cold tumors. Sub-analysis of 7 lesions near the separation point showed a higher absolute difference (0.16) between QPSECT and Flash 3D mean uptake ratios compared to the remaining lesions. Our finding of improved separation between uptake ratios of hot and cold lesions using QSPECT reconstruction lays the foundation for additional quantitative SPECT techniques such as SPECT-UV in the setting of renal Tc-99m-sestamibi and other SPECT/CT exams. With robust quantitative image reconstruction and biomarker analysis, there may be an expanded role for SPECT/CT imaging in renal masses and other pathologic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of quantitative SPECT/CT reconstruction in 99mTc-sestamibi imaging of patients with renal masses
    Krystyna M. Jones
    Lilja B. Solnes
    Steven P. Rowe
    Michael A. Gorin
    Sara Sheikhbahaei
    George Fung
    Eric C. Frey
    Mohamad E. Allaf
    Yong Du
    Mehrbod S. Javadi
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2018, 32 : 87 - 93
  • [2] 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the characterization of renal masses: a pictorial guide
    Campbell, Scott P.
    Tzortzakakis, Antonios
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Karlsson, Mattias
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    Axelsson, Rimma
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1084)
  • [3] A review of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for renal oncocytomas: A modified diagnostic algorithm
    Wilson, Mitchell P.
    Katlariwala, Prayash
    Abele, Jonathan
    Low, Gavin
    INTRACTABLE & RARE DISEASES RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02) : 46 - 51
  • [4] Diagnostic Accuracy of 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT for Characterization of Solid Renal Masses
    Parihar, Ashwin Singh
    Mhlanga, Joyce
    Ronstrom, Carrie
    Schmidt, Lisa R.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Wahl, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64 (01) : 90 - 95
  • [5] Parotid Oncocytoma on 99mTc-Sestamibi Scintigraphy and SPECT/CT
    Kirkland, John W.
    Zhao, Jason M.
    McWhorter, Nathan E.
    Banks, Kevin P.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (06) : 480 - 482
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT to Guide Management of Small Renal Masses
    Su, Zhuo T.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Huang, Mitchell M.
    Meyer, Alexa R.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (04): : 827 - 834
  • [7] Lack of effect of renal function on uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi in renal masses
    Amindarolzarbi, Alireza
    Satcowitz, Kendall
    Khalil, Adham
    Osman, Sena
    Murtazaliev, Salikh
    Al-Zubaidi, Anas
    Viglianti, Benjamin L.
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    Kaufmann, Basil
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Oldan, Jorge D.
    Benefield, Thad
    Singla, Nirmish
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 46 (05) : 392 - 395
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for detecting renal oncocytomas and other benign renal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wilson, Mitchell P.
    Katlariwala, Prayash
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    Abele, Jonathan
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Low, Gavin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (08) : 2532 - 2541
  • [9] Influence of Multigland Parathyroid Disease on 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT/CT
    Nichols, Kenneth James
    Tronco, Gene G.
    Palestro, Christopher J.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (04) : 282 - 288
  • [10] Incidental Primary Breast Lymphoma on 99mTc-Sestamibi Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With SPECT/CT
    Deng, Zilong
    Dong, Aisheng
    Zhao, Min
    Tang, Youhong
    Liu, Yutao
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (08) : E492 - E494