A piece of research on the evolution of teachers' didactic knowledge about assessment in science

被引:0
作者
Lopez-Lozano, Lidia [1 ]
Solis Ramirez, Emilio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Escuela Univ Osuna, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Didact Ciencias Expt & Sociales, Seville, Spain
来源
ENSENANZA DE LAS CIENCIAS | 2020年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
Pre-service teacher education; Mixed methods; Alternative assessment; Science education; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; CONCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2755
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We present a study to delve in the processes of change in pre-service teachers' didactic knowledge on assessment in science. A mixed methodology is applied under a concurrent design with qualitative and quantitative techniques using a triangulation process. The study involves 347 students from the degree in Primary Education taking the subject of Experimental Sciences Didactics. Questionnaires, instructional activities and designs of teaching units for data collection are applied. The procedure followed is valuable and useful for documenting the evolution in teachers' conceptions. The results show changes related to a greater coherence between the declarative and factual knowledge of the teachers at the end of the course, stimulated by the reflection on their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 104
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abell S., 2010, DESIGNING TEACHING E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SUMA
[3]  
[Anonymous], INVESTIGACION ESCUEL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INVESTIGACION ESCUEL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, TAMANO EFECTO EFFECT
[6]  
Bardin L., 1996, Analisis de contenido
[7]  
Beavers A. S., 2013, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, V18, P6, DOI [10.7275/qv2q-rk76, DOI 10.7275/QV2Q-RK76]
[8]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[9]  
Bisquerra R., 2004, Metodologia de la investigacion educativa
[10]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31