Qualitatively capturing institutional logics

被引：243
|
作者：
Reay, Trish [1 ]
Jones, Candace [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Alberta, Sch Business, Dept Strateg Management & Org, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Business, Global Creat Enterprise, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源：
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION | 2016年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词：
Content analysis; ethnography; grounded theory; institutional change; institutional theory; qualitative methods; research methods; topics and perspectives; COMPLEXITY; FIELD;
D O I：
10.1177/1476127015589981
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
There is an ever-increasing volume of studies investigating institutional logics, and yet qualitative methods for studying this phenomenon are not clear. In this essay, we examine how qualitative scholars convince their readers that they are actually studying institutional logics. We identify three different, but non-exclusive techniques that have been employed: pattern deducing, pattern matching, and pattern inducing. For each of these approaches, we explain the ontological assumptions, methodological techniques, challenges, and benefits. In addition, we provide examples of how specific studies have analyzed and presented qualitative data to improve theory about institutional logics.
引用
收藏
页码：441 / 454
页数：14
相关论文
共 50 条
12345