Government support and innovation for new energy firms in China

被引:42
作者
Du, Weijian [1 ]
Li, Mengjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Technol & Business Univ, Coll Econ, Synergy Innovat Ctr Energy Econ Shandong, Yantai 264005, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
国家教育部科学基金资助; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government support; innovation probability; innovation density; propensity score matching; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; MARKET COMPETITION; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; LEVEL; SUBSIDIES; SIZE; PROPENSITY; INDUSTRY; EXPORTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2018.1558356
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Government support plays an important role in the Chinese economy. New energy industries, which involve innovation-driven sources and environmental protection, are also supported by the government. This paper aims to study the effects of supply-side traditional government support on firms' innovation and development. We propose a theoretical mechanism and study the innovation reaction of firms to government support in different situations. We further use propensity score matching to verify the results in the theoretical model and conduct a robustness analysis. Our main conclusions include the following. (1) In normal years, government support can promote only the innovation output of firms that have innovated; however, support cannot promote the innovation probability of firms that have not innovated. Government support can only enhance the intensive margin of innovation and cannot enhance the extensive margin of innovation with less competition. (2) In the situation of a bad economic environment and intense competition, firms' innovation probability rises as government support increases. Therefore, the government should provide more R&D special subsidies and implement strict financial supervision to make support policies effective, especially in normal years.
引用
收藏
页码:2754 / 2763
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   The impact of innovation intensity, scope, and spillovers on sales growth in Chinese firms [J].
Choi, Suk Bong ;
Williams, Christopher .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (01) :25-46
[12]   Government policy, network externalities and mobile telecommunication services: evidence from OECD countries [J].
Chung, J. H. ;
Yoo, T. H. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (21) :2173-2183
[13]  
Clausen Tommy H., 2009, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V20, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2009.09.004
[14]   Innovation and imitation: substitutes or complements? [J].
Collins, Tracy .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 24 (12) :863-867
[15]   Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity [J].
Crescenzi, Riccardo ;
Gagliardi, Luisa ;
Iammarino, Simona .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :596-609
[16]   Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies [J].
Crowley, Frank ;
McCann, Philip .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (11) :1203-1221
[17]   Exports, productivity and innovation: new firm level empirical evidence [J].
Faustino, Horacio C. ;
Matos, Pedro Verga .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (46) :4918-4933
[18]   Rethinking the Role of Fiscal Policy [J].
Feldstein, Martin .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :556-559
[19]   Exports and Productivity Growth: First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach [J].
Fryges, Helmut ;
Wagner, Joachim .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2008, 144 (04) :695-722
[20]  
Garst J., 2017, SUSTAINABILITY, V9, P29