Planned early discharge-elective surgical readmission pathway for patients with gallstone pancreatitis

被引:15
作者
Clarke, Tatyan [1 ,2 ]
Sohn, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Kelso, Rebecca [4 ]
Petrosyan, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
Towfigh, Shirin [3 ]
Mason, Rodney [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Los Angeles Cty USC Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Vasc Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.143.9.901
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: We assessed outcomes in patients with gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) managed using a readmission pathway of discharge from the index admission with early readmission cholecystectomy and compared these with conventional management. We hypothesized that the pathway would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: County-based academic center. Patients: All patients admitted with GSP between June 1, 2005, and June 30, 2007. The control group consisted of patients from the year before the adoption of the readmission pathway. The pathway group patients were enrolled in the first year from its inception (July 1, 2006). Main Outcome Measures: Overall LOS, time from admission until operation, and pathway failures. Results: Of 252 patients with GSP, 144 were managed by conventional methods, and 108 were managed using the readmission pathway. The overall mean (SD) LOS was 8.5 (6.0) days in the control group and 5.9 (3.1) days in the pathway group (P < .001). The mean (SD) times to surgery were 6.6 (4.5) days in the control group and 22.7 (10.4) days in the pathway group (P = .01). This did not lead to significantly more treatment failures, with 34 (23.6%) in the control group and 33 (30.6%) in the pathway group (P = .21). There were 6.5% (7 of 108) unplanned readmissions for recurrent pancreatitis in the pathway group. Morbidity was otherwise similar in both groups. Conclusion: Use of the readmission pathway's early discharge protocol decreased overall LOS and in this study population was not associated with any increase in morbidity compared with conventional management.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 905
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]  
McGrath MF, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P826
[12]   EARLY SURGERY FOR BILIARY PANCREATITIS [J].
MERCER, LC ;
SALTZSTEIN, EC ;
PEACOCK, JB ;
DOUGHERTY, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 148 (06) :749-753
[13]   MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES IN THE ERA OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
MILLER, RE ;
KIMMELSTIEL, FM ;
WINKLER, WP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (02) :273-276
[14]   An audit of the management of patients with acute pancreatitis against national standards of practice [J].
Mofidi, R. ;
Madhavan, K. K. ;
Garden, O. J. ;
Parks, R. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (07) :844-848
[15]   TRADITIONAL SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY DURING A 20-YEAR EXPERIENCE [J].
MOREAUX, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (02) :220-226
[16]   Sphincterotomy and the gall bladder - A slice of luck [J].
ODonnell, LJD .
GUT, 1996, 39 (06) :885-886
[17]   Early endoscopic intervention versus early conservative management in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and biliopancreatic obstruction -: A randomized clinical trial [J].
Oria, Alejandro ;
Cimmino, Daniel ;
Ocampo, Carlos ;
Silva, Walter ;
Kohan, Gustavo ;
Zandalazini, Hugo ;
Szelagowski, Carlos ;
Chiappetta, Luis .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (01) :10-17
[18]   SURGERY FOR GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS [J].
PELLEGRINI, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :515-518
[19]   TIMING OF BILIARY SURGERY IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
RANSON, JHC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1979, 189 (05) :654-663
[20]   THE ROLE OF SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
RANSON, JHC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 211 (04) :382-394