Planned early discharge-elective surgical readmission pathway for patients with gallstone pancreatitis

被引:15
作者
Clarke, Tatyan [1 ,2 ]
Sohn, Helen [1 ,2 ]
Kelso, Rebecca [4 ]
Petrosyan, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
Towfigh, Shirin [3 ]
Mason, Rodney [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Los Angeles Cty USC Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Vasc Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.143.9.901
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: We assessed outcomes in patients with gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) managed using a readmission pathway of discharge from the index admission with early readmission cholecystectomy and compared these with conventional management. We hypothesized that the pathway would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: County-based academic center. Patients: All patients admitted with GSP between June 1, 2005, and June 30, 2007. The control group consisted of patients from the year before the adoption of the readmission pathway. The pathway group patients were enrolled in the first year from its inception (July 1, 2006). Main Outcome Measures: Overall LOS, time from admission until operation, and pathway failures. Results: Of 252 patients with GSP, 144 were managed by conventional methods, and 108 were managed using the readmission pathway. The overall mean (SD) LOS was 8.5 (6.0) days in the control group and 5.9 (3.1) days in the pathway group (P < .001). The mean (SD) times to surgery were 6.6 (4.5) days in the control group and 22.7 (10.4) days in the pathway group (P = .01). This did not lead to significantly more treatment failures, with 34 (23.6%) in the control group and 33 (30.6%) in the pathway group (P = .21). There were 6.5% (7 of 108) unplanned readmissions for recurrent pancreatitis in the pathway group. Morbidity was otherwise similar in both groups. Conclusion: Use of the readmission pathway's early discharge protocol decreased overall LOS and in this study population was not associated with any increase in morbidity compared with conventional management.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 905
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction - A prospective randomized clinical trial [J].
Acosta, JM ;
Katkhouda, N ;
Debian, KA ;
Groshen, SG ;
Tsao-Wei, DD ;
Berne, TV .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (01) :33-40
[2]   When is pancreatitis considered to be of biliary origin and what are the implications for management? [J].
Alexakis, N. ;
Lombard, M. ;
Raraty, M. ;
Ghaneh, P. ;
Smart, H. L. ;
Gilmore, I. ;
Evans, J. ;
Hughes, M. ;
Garvey, C. ;
Sutton, R. ;
Neoptolemos, J. P. .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2007, 7 (2-3) :131-141
[3]   ALGORITHM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS [J].
Alexakis, N. ;
Neoptolemos, J. P. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 94 (02) :124-129
[4]   PANCREATIC-DUCT REFLUX AND ACUTE GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS [J].
ARMSTRONG, CP ;
TAYLOR, TV .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1986, 204 (01) :59-64
[5]  
ELFSTROM J, 1978, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V144, P487
[6]   Early ERCP and papillotomy compared with conservative treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis [J].
Folsch, UR ;
Nitsche, R ;
Ludtke, R ;
Hilgers, RA ;
Creutzfeldt, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (04) :237-242
[7]   BILIARY PANCREATITIS - CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT [J].
FREI, GJ ;
FREI, VT ;
THIRLBY, RC ;
MCCLELLAND, RN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 151 (01) :170-175
[8]  
Glazer G, 1998, GUT, V42, pS1
[9]   JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management [J].
Isaji, S ;
Takada, T ;
Kawarada, Y ;
Hirata, K ;
Mayumi, T ;
Yoshida, M ;
Sekimoto, M ;
Hirota, M ;
Kimura, Y ;
Takeda, K ;
Koizumi, M ;
Otsuki, M ;
Matsuno, S .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2006, 13 (01) :48-55
[10]  
KELLY TR, 1980, SURGERY, V88, P345