Revisiting incubation performance How incubator typology affects results

被引：99

作者：

Barbero, Jose L. ^{[1
]}

Casillas, Jose C. ^{[2
]}

Ramos, Alicia ^{[2
]}

Guitar, Susana ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain

[2] Univ Seville, Dept Adm Empresas & Mkt, Seville 41018, Spain

[3] Andalusian Innovat Reg Minist, Seville 41092, Spain

来源：

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE | 2012年 / 79卷 / 05期

关键词：

Incubation; Types of incubators; Performance; Growth; TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS; SCIENCE PARKS; BUSINESS INCUBATORS; VIRTUAL INCUBATOR; FUTURE-RESEARCH; INNOVATION; GROWTH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.003

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Relevant literature has discussed incubator versus nonincubator firm performance and the characteristics of different types of incubators. However, it has not considered assessing performance individually by archetype. We studied company performance in four archetypal incubators. Performance measures used fall into five categories drawn from literature: a) firm growth b) participation in R&D programs c) Input R&D d) Output R&D e) Employment generation cost. We find there are significant differences in three of the five performance categories among incubator types. We assess the performance of each one by determining whether the objectives for which each was created are met. Private, basic research and University archetypes meet their objectives. Regional development archetype does not. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：888 / 902

页数：15

共 50 条

[1] Explaining incubators using firm analogy [J].