Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context

被引:136
作者
Lievens, F [1 ]
Van Hoye, G [1 ]
Schreurs, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Personnel Management & Work & Org Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1348/09631790X26688
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study uses Cable and Turban's (2001) employer knowledge framework as a conceptual model to formulate hypotheses about a broad range of possible factors affecting the attractiveness of an organization (i.e. armed forces) among potential applicants (576 high-school seniors). Results show that gender, familiarity with military organizations, perceptions of job and organizational attributes (task diversity and social/team activities), and trait inferences (excitement, prestige, and cheerfulness) explained potential applicants' attraction to military organizations. Relative importance analyses showed that trait inferences contributed most to the variance, followed by job and organizational attributes, and employer familiarity. Finally, we found some evidence of interactions between the three dimensions. Specifically, trait inferences and job and organizational attributes had more pronounced effects when familiarity was high. From a theoretical perspective, these results generally support the framework of employer knowledge. At a practical level, implications for image audit and image management are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 572
页数:20
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[12]   FURTHER EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SEARCH AND VOLUNTARY INDIVIDUAL TURNOVER [J].
BLAU, G .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (02) :313-330
[13]   EXPOSURE AND AFFECT - OVERVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH, 1968-1987 [J].
BORNSTEIN, RF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (02) :265-289
[14]  
Breaugh James A., 1992, Recruitment: Science and Practice
[15]   Familiarity, ambivalence, and firm reputation: Is corporate fame a double-edged sword? [J].
Brooks, ME ;
Highhouse, S ;
Russell, SS ;
Mohr, DC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :904-914
[16]  
Cable DM, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P929, DOI 10.1002/1099-1379(200012)21:8<929::AID-JOB63>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-O
[18]  
CABLE DM, 2001, RES PERSONNEL HUMAN, P115
[19]   Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit? [J].
Caprara, GV ;
Barbaranelli, C ;
Guido, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (03) :377-395
[20]   Recruitment evaluation: The case for assessing the quality of applicants attracted [J].
Carlson, KD ;
Connerley, ML ;
Mecham, RL .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (02) :461-490