Olfactory Sensitivity and Odor Structure-Activity Relationships for Aliphatic Carboxylic Acids in CD-1 Mice

被引:22
作者
Guven, Selcuk Can [1 ]
Laska, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Phys Chem & Biol, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
REPRESENTATIONS; DISCRIMINATION; BULB; MAP;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0034301
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of CD-1 mice for a homologous series of aliphatic n-carboxylic acids (ethanoic acid to n-octanoic acid) and several of their isomeric forms was investigated. With all 14 odorants, the animals significantly discriminated concentrations as low as 0.03 ppm (parts per million) from the solvent, and with four odorants the best-scoring animals even detected concentrations as low as 3 ppt (parts per trillion). Analysis of odor structure-activity relationships showed that the correlation between olfactory detection thresholds of the mice for the unbranched carboxylic acids and carbon chain length can best be described as a U-shaped function with the lowest threshold values at n-butanoic acid. A significant positive correlation between olfactory detection thresholds and carbon chain length of the carboxylic acids with their branching next to the functional carboxyl group was found. In contrast, no such correlation was found for carboxylic acids with their branching at the distal end of the carbon chain relative to the functional carboxyl group. Finally, a significant correlation was found between olfactory detection thresholds and the position of the branching of the carboxylic acids. Across-species comparisons suggest that mice are more sensitive for short-chained (C-2 to C-4) aliphatic n-carboxylic acids than other mammalian species, but not for longer-chained ones (C-5 to C-8). Further comparisons suggest that odor structure-activity relationships are both substance class- and species-specific.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: Odor detection, discrimination and odor memory
    Bodyak, N
    Slotnick, B
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1999, 24 (06) : 637 - 645
  • [2] BRETTING H, 1972, Zeitschrift fuer Saeugetierkunde, V37, P286
  • [3] Brown R.E., 1985, Social odours in mammals, P345, DOI [10.1016/0376-6357(86)90097-5, DOI 10.1016/0376-6357(86)90097-5]
  • [4] Structure-activity relationships on the odor detectability of homologous carboxylic acids by humans
    Cometto-Muniz, J. Enrique
    Abraham, Michael H.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (1-2) : 75 - 84
  • [5] Hyposmia for butanol and vanillin in mutant staggerer male mice
    Deiss, V
    Baudoin, C
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1997, 61 (02) : 209 - 213
  • [6] Doty R.L., 2003, Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, V2nd, P203, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203911457
  • [7] Dykyi J, 2001, LANDOLT BORNSTEIN NU, V20
  • [8] Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates
    Gilad, Y
    Wiebel, V
    Przeworski, M
    Lancet, D
    Pääbo, S
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [9] The mouse olfactory receptor gene family
    Godfrey, PA
    Malnic, B
    Buck, LB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (07) : 2156 - 2161
  • [10] Hastings L., 2003, HDB OLFACTION GUSTAT, P385