Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory

被引：37

作者：

Nishi, Daisuke ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
]}

Matsuoka, Yutaka ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
]}

Noguchi, Hiroko ^{[2
,3
,4
,6
]}

Sakuma, Kyoko ^{[2
,3
,4
]}

Yonemoto, Naohiro ^{[7
]}

Yanagita, Tami ^{[8
]}

Homma, Masato ^{[9
]}

Kanba, Shigenobu ^{[5
]}

Kim, Yoshiharu ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Disaster Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Tokyo 1900014, Japan

[2] Natl Disaster Med Ctr, Clin Res Inst, Tokyo 1900014, Japan

[3] Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, NIMH, Dept Adult Mental Hlth, Kodaira, Tokyo 1878553, Japan

[4] Japan Sci & Technol Agcy, CREST, Tokyo 1900014, Japan

[5] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Neuropsychiat, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan

[6] Musashino Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Human Sci & Culture, Tokyo 2028585, Japan

[7] Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, NIMH, Dept Psychogeriatr, Kodaira, Tokyo 1878553, Japan

[8] Niigata Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Clin Psychol, Niigata 9502181, Japan

[9] Natl Disaster Med Ctr, Dept Crit Care & Traumatol, Tokyo 1900014, Japan

来源：

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY | 2009年 / 31卷 / 01期

基金：

日本科学技术振兴机构;

关键词：

Reliability; Validity; Peritraumatic distress inventory; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; SOCIAL SUPPORT; INJURY; SCALE; RISK;

D O I：

10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.002

中图分类号：

R749 [精神病学];

学科分类号：

100205 ;

摘要：

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI). Method: One hundred thirty-five participants with physical injury resulting from motor vehicle accidents were consecutively recruited in this cross-sectional study. from Aug. 18, 2005, to Jan. 9, 2008. A subsample (n=71) were retested on the PDI an average of 96.4 days after initial measure completion. Results: Correlational analyses revealed an overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.83. The item-total correlations for the 13 items ranged from 0.29 to 0.75. The test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.61. The PDI was significantly correlated with the external validators such as peritraumatic dissociation as measured by the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ); the intrusion, avoidance and hyperarousal scores of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R); and the depression and anxiety subscales of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) (P<.01). Conclusion: The present study indicated that the Japanese version of the PDI has a high degree of internal consistency, acceptable reliability and a high degree of concurrent validity with measures of peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic symptoms. The Japanese version of the PDI can be used as a validated instrument in future research. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：75 / 79

页数：5

共 22 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1980, DSM 3

[2]

[Anonymous], 1997, IMPACT EVENT SCALE R

[3] Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R-J): Four studies of different traumatic events [J].