External validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score for patients presenting with undifferentiated syncope to the emergency department

被引:9
|
作者
Chan, Jason [1 ,2 ]
Ballard, Emma [3 ]
Brain, David [4 ]
Hocking, Julia [5 ]
Yan, Alan [1 ,2 ]
Morel, Douglas [1 ,2 ]
Hunter, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Redcliffe Hosp, Emergency Dept, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Stat Unit, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
clinical decision rule; emergency department; risk stratification; syncope; validation; SHORT-TERM; STRATIFICATION; RULE; PROGNOSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/1742-6723.13641
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective To validate the accuracy and safety of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) for patients presenting with syncope. Methods Single centre prospective observational study in Brisbane, Australia. Adults presenting to the ED with syncope within the last 24 h were recruited after applying exclusion criteria. Study was conducted over 1 year, from March 2018 to March 2019. Thirty-day serious adverse events (SAE) were reported based on the original derivation study and standardised outcome reporting for syncope. Individual patient CSRS was calculated and correlated with 30-day SAE and disposition status from ED. Results Two hundred and eighty-three patients were recruited to the study. Average age was 55.6 years (SD 22.7 years), 37.1% being male with a 39.9% admission rate. Thirty-day SAE occurred in seven patients (2.5%) and no recorded deaths. The CSRS performed with a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.3-94.9%), specificity 72.8% (95% CI 67.1-77.9%) for a threshold score of 1 or higher. Conclusion Syncope patients in our study were predominantly very low to low risk (72%). The prevalence of 30-day SAE was low, majority occurring following hospital discharge. Sensitivity estimates for CSRS was lower than the derivation study but lacked robustness with wide CIs because of a small sample size and number of events observed. However, the CSRS did not miss any clinically relevant outcomes in low risk patients making it potentially useful in aiding their disposition. Larger validation studies in Australia are encouraged to further test the diagnostic accuracy of the CSRS.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 424
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating patients presenting to the emergency department after syncope: validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
    Chan, Jason
    Hunter, Jonathan
    Morel, Douglas
    Ballard, Emma
    Brain, David
    Yan, Alan
    Hocking, Julia
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2019, 210 (11) : 507 - +
  • [2] Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    Le Sage, Natalie
    Yan, Justin W.
    Huang, Paul
    Hegdekar, Mona
    Mercier, Eric
    Mukarram, Muhammad
    Nemnom, Marie-Joe
    McRae, Andrew D.
    Rowe, Brian H.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    Wells, George A.
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    Taljaard, Monica
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 180 (05) : 737 - 744
  • [3] Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
    Kwong, Kenneth
    Wells, George A.
    Sivilotti, Marco L. A.
    Mukarram, Muhammad
    Rowe, Brian H.
    Lang, Eddy
    Perry, Jeffrey J.
    Sheldon, Robert
    Stiell, Ian G.
    Taljaard, Monica
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 188 (12) : E289 - E298
  • [4] Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the Emergency Department
    Costantino, Giorgio
    Falavigna, Greta
    Solbiati, Monica
    Casagranda, Ivo
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    Grossman, Shamai A.
    Quinn, James V.
    Reed, Matthew J.
    Ungar, Andrea
    Montano, Nicola
    Furlan, Raffaello
    Ippoliti, Roberto
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (11): : 1891 - 1895
  • [5] OUTCOMES IN CANADIAN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SYNCOPE PATIENTS - ARE WE DOING A GOOD JOB?
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
    Hess, Erik P.
    Turko, Ekaterina
    Perry, Jeffrey J.
    Wells, George A.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (02) : 321 - 328
  • [6] Prognostic value of the OESIL risk score in a cohort of Emergency Department patients with syncope
    Numeroso, F.
    Mossini, G.
    Montali, F.
    Lippi, G.
    Cervellin, G.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2013, 104 (04) : 413 - 419
  • [7] International Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score A Cohort Study
    Zimmermann, Tobias
    de Lavallaz, Jeanne du Fay
    Nestelberger, Thomas
    Gualandro, Danielle M.
    Lopez-Ayala, Pedro
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Widmer, Velina
    Shrestha, Samyut
    Strebel, Ivo
    Glarner, Noemi
    Diebold, Matthias
    Miro, Oscar
    Christ, Michael
    Cullen, Louise
    Than, Martin
    Javier Martin-Sanchez, F.
    Di Somma, Salvatore
    Peacock, W. Frank
    Keller, Dagmar, I
    Bilici, Murat
    Pablo Costabel, Juan
    Kuhne, Michael
    Breidthardt, Tobias
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh
    Mueller, Christian
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 175 (06) : 783 - +
  • [8] Syncope: the emergency department and beyond
    Williamson, Catriona
    Reed, Matthew James
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 10 (07) : 843 - 850
  • [9] Can the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) help to risk stratify emergency department patients presenting with syncope without an evident serious cause?
    Ragan, Kelsey M.
    Lin, Katie Y.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (01) : 34 - 35
  • [10] Comparison of syncope risk scores in predicting the prognosis of patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope
    Ince, Cagdas
    Gulen, Muge
    Acehan, Selen
    Sevdimbas, Sarper
    Balcik, Muhammet
    Yuksek, Ali
    Satar, Salim
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 192 (06) : 2727 - 2734