An estimation of regional emission intensity of coal mine methane based on coefficient-intensity factor methodology using China as a case study

被引:18
作者
Wang, Ning [1 ]
Wen, Zongguo [2 ]
Zhu, Tao [3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100086, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, SKLESPC, Beijing 100086, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Sch Chem & Environm Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
coal mine methane; coefficient-intensity factor methodology; relative gas emission rate; classification outflow coefficient; regional emission intensity factor; DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1002/ghg.1485
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Coal mine methane (CMM) is an important component of greenhouse gas (GHG) control, clean energy, and coal mining safety. Because of the complicated geological conditions and non-linear characteristics of CMM emissions, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calculation methodology of CMM emissions is based on a large emission factor range (10-25 m(3)/t), limiting the accuracy of the CMM emissions calculation. This paper studies CMM emission characteristics, and designs a coefficient-intensity factor methodology integrated with IPCC methodology, to make a contribution to increase its applicability to regional circumstances. Using China as a case study, this paper uses 798 mines as samples, aiming to find a function of the relative gas emission rate and coal production. Through the calculation of the classification outflow coefficient and the regional emission intensity factor, the national emission intensity factor is about 9.176, which is lower than the minimum of IPCC emission factors for underground mining. (C) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 448
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   NO emissions in oxy-coal combustion with the addition of steam in an entrained flow reactor [J].
Alvarez, Lucia ;
Riaza, Juan ;
Gil, Maria V. ;
Pevida, Covadonga ;
Pis, Jose J. ;
Rubiera, Fernando .
GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 1 (02) :180-190
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Key World Energy Statistics
[3]   Status of worldwide coal mine methane emissions and use [J].
Bibler, CJ ;
Marshall, JS ;
Pilcher, RC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 35 (1-4) :283-310
[4]   Methodology of coalbed methane resource assessment [J].
Boyer, CM ;
Bai, QZ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 35 (1-4) :349-368
[5]   Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China [J].
Cheng, Yuan-Ping ;
Wang, Lei ;
Zhang, Xiao-Lei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (01) :157-166
[6]   Coalbed Methane: Current Field-Based Evaluation Methods [J].
Clarkson, C. R. ;
Bustin, R. M. .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2011, 14 (01) :60-75
[7]   Coalbed methane liquefaction adopting a nitrogen expansion process with propane pre-cooling [J].
Gao, Ting ;
Lin, Wensheng ;
Gu, Anzhong ;
Gu, Min .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (07) :2142-2147
[8]  
IPCC, 2013, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDAN
[9]  
Jiang HQ, 2011, STAT ACCOUNTING TECH
[10]   Coal mine methane: A review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction [J].
Karacan, C. Oezgen ;
Ruiz, Felicia A. ;
Cote, Michael ;
Phipps, Sally .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2011, 86 (2-3) :121-156