Complete versus culprit-only revascularization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease: A meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Lu, Cong [1 ]
Huang, Hao [1 ]
Li, Jing [2 ]
Zhao, Jianxun [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [1 ]
Zeng, Zhi [1 ]
Chen, Yucheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Div Cardiol, West China Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Dept Evidence Based Med Ctr & Clin Epidemiol, West China Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Complete revascularization; Multivessel disease; ST-elevation myocardial infarction; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; VESSEL; SINGLE; REPERFUSION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.kjms.2012.08.024
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease is controversial. Current guidelines recommend treatment of the culprit artery alone during the primary procedure. However, with improvements in stent technique and with the use of new antiplatelet drugs (GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors), complete revascularization (CR) at an early stage is attracting increasing attention. We conducted an English language search on Medline (PubMed database), Embase, and the Cochrane databases between January 1966 and January 2011, as well as a search on the China National Knowledge Internet (1979-January 2011), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (1978-January 2011). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that compared the two strategies in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. Thirteen articles were selected, 8240 patients in the CR group and 51,998 in the culprit-only revascularization group. CR was associated with an increased short-term mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.26, 1.53)], a long-term mortality [OR = 1.35, 95% CI = (1.09, 1.67)], and an increased risk of renal failure [OR (95% CI) = 1.24 (1.11, 1.38)] in patients with STEMI and MVD at the primary procedure. In addition, CR did not reduce the rate of short-term major adverse cardiac events [OR (95% CI) = 1.52 (0.88, 2.61)] and remyocardial infarction [OR = 0.57, 95% CI = (0.25, 1.29)]. However, CR was associated with a marked reduction in the rate of revascularization [OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.27, 0.74)]. This analysis of current available data demonstrates that CR during primary PCI can put those patients with STEMI and MVD at risk. To clarify this issue, large RCTs are needed. Copyright (C) 2013, Kaohsiung Medical University. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Antman E., 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V44
  • [2] Antman EM, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V51, P2028, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002, 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.001]
  • [3] Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Non-Infarct Artery Intervention During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry)
    Cavender, Matthew A.
    Milford-Beland, Sarah
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Weintraub, William S.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (04) : 507 - 513
  • [4] Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction
    Corpus, RA
    House, JA
    Marso, SP
    Grantham, A
    Huber, KC
    Laster, SB
    Johnson, WL
    Daniels, WC
    Barth, CW
    Giorgi, LV
    Rutherford, BD
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 148 (03) : 493 - 500
  • [5] Deeks J J, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, piii
  • [6] Di Mario Carlo, 2004, Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, V6, P128
  • [7] Impact of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Noninfarct-Related Artery Revascularization on Outcome of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry)
    Dziewierz, Artur
    Siudak, Zbigniew
    Rakowski, Tomasz
    Zasada, Wojciech
    Dubiel, Jacek S.
    Dudek, Dariusz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (03) : 342 - 347
  • [8] Culprit Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease
    Hannan, Edward L.
    Samadashvili, Zaza
    Walford, Gary
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Stamato, Nicholas J.
    Venditti, Ferdinand J.
    Sharma, Samin
    King, Spencer B., III
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [9] OUTCOME OF URGENT PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - COMPARISON OF SINGLE-VESSEL VERSUS MULTIVESSEL CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    JASKI, BE
    COHEN, JD
    TRAUSCH, J
    MARSH, DG
    BAIL, GR
    OVERLIE, PA
    SKOWRONSKI, EW
    SMITH, SC
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 124 (06) : 1427 - 1433
  • [10] Multi-vessel stenting during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction
    Khattab, A. A.
    Abdel-Wahab, M.
    Roether, C.
    Liska, B.
    Toelg, R.
    Kassner, G.
    Geist, V.
    Richardt, G.
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 97 (01) : 32 - 38