Identification of hydrologic drought triggers from hydroclimatic predictor variables

被引:50
作者
Maity, Rajib [1 ]
Ramadas, Meenu [2 ]
Govindaraju, Rao S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
drought triggers; asymmetric Archimedean copulas; principal component analysis; streamflow; probabilistic prediction; SOIL-MOISTURE; COPULA; VARIABILITY; OSCILLATION; DEPENDENCE; MODEL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/wrcr.20346
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Drought triggers are patterns in hydroclimatic variables that herald upcoming droughts and form the basis for mitigation plans. This study develops a new method for identification of triggers for hydrologic droughts by examining the association between the various hydroclimatic variables and streamflows. Since numerous variables influence streamflows to varying degrees, principal component analysis (PCA) is utilized for dimensionality reduction in predictor hydroclimatic variables. The joint dependence between the first two principal components, that explain over 98% of the variability in the predictor set, and streamflows is computed by a scale-free measure of association using asymmetric Archimedean copulas over two study watersheds in Indiana, USA, with unregulated streamflows. The M6 copula model is found to be suitable for the data and is utilized to find expected values and ranges of predictor hydroclimatic variables for different streamflow quantiles. This information is utilized to develop drought triggers for 1 month lead time over the study areas. For the two study watersheds, soil moisture, precipitation, and runoff are found to provide the fidelity to resolve amongst different drought classes. Combining the strengths of PCA for dimensionality reduction and copulas for building joint dependence allows the development of hydrologic drought triggers in an efficient manner.
引用
收藏
页码:4476 / 4492
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Comparison of ANNs and empirical approaches for predicting watershed runoff [J].
Anmala, J ;
Zhang, B ;
Govindaraju, RS .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 126 (03) :156-166
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Nonparametric statistical inference, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_420
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Dev. Atmos. Sci
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, NAT MIT STRAT PARTN
[5]   A Hydroclimatological Assessment of Regional Drought Vulnerability: A Case Study of Indiana Droughts [J].
Charusombat, Umarporn ;
Niyogi, Dev .
EARTH INTERACTIONS, 2011, 15 :1-65
[6]  
Deheuvels P., 1981, PUBL I STAT U PARIS, V26, P29
[7]   ON THE DEFINITION OF DROUGHTS [J].
DRACUP, JA ;
LEE, KS ;
PAULSON, EG .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (02) :297-302
[8]  
Edwards D.C., 1997, Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales, DOI DOI 10.17616/R31NJMSY
[9]  
Embrechts P, 2003, HANDBOOKS FINANCE, P329, DOI 10.1016/B978-044450896-6.50010-8
[10]   Climate Prediction Center global monthly soil moisture data set at 0.5° resolution for 1948 to present -: art. no. D10102 [J].
Fan, Y ;
van den Dool, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D10) :D101021-8