Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials

被引:144
作者
Coons, Stephen Joel [1 ]
Eremenco, Sonya [2 ]
Lundy, J. Jason [1 ]
O'Donohoe, Paul [3 ]
O'Gorman, Hannah [4 ]
Malizia, William [5 ]
机构
[1] Crit Path Inst, Tucson, AZ 85718 USA
[2] Evidera, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] CRF Hlth, London, England
[4] Exco InTouch Ltd, Nottingham, England
[5] Sungard Availabil Serv, Wayne, PA USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PAPER; RECOMMENDATIONS; EQUIVALENCE; VALIDATION; COLLECTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-014-0090-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important means of evaluating the treatment benefit of new medical products. It is recognized that PRO measures should be used when assessing concepts best known by the patient or best measured from the patient's perspective. As a result, there is growing emphasis on well defined and reliable PRO measures. In addition, advances in technology have significantly increased electronic PRO (ePRO) data collection capabilities and options in clinical trials. The movement from paper-based to ePRO data capture has enhanced the integrity and accuracy of clinical trial data and is encouraged by regulators. A primary distinction in the types of ePRO platforms is between telephone-based interactive voice response systems and screen-based systems. Handheld touchscreen-based devices have become the mainstay for remote (i.e., off-site, unsupervised) PRO data collection in clinical trials. The conventional approach is to provide study subjects with a handheld device with a device-based proprietary software program. However, an emerging alternative for clinical trials is called bring your own device (BYOD). Leveraging study subjects' own Internet-enabled mobile devices for remote PRO data collection (via a downloadable app or a Web-based data collection portal) has become possible due to the widespread use of personal smartphones and tablets. However, there are a number of scientific and operational issues that must be addressed before BYOD can be routinely considered as a practical alternative to conventional ePRO data collection methods. Nevertheless, the future for ePRO data collection is bright and the promise of BYOD opens a new chapter in its evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID IND EL SOURC DA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ASSISTEKS EPRO BIOTE
[3]  
Burke LB, 2011, MEASURING TREATMENT
[4]   Validation of electronic data capture of the irritable bowel syndrome - Quality of life measure, the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire for irritable bowel syndrome and the EuroQol [J].
Bushnell, DM ;
Reilly, MC ;
Galani, C ;
Martin, ML ;
Ricci, JF ;
Patrick, DL ;
McBurney, CR .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (02) :98-105
[5]   Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report [J].
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Gwaltney, Chad J. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Lundy, J. Jason ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Lenderking, William R. ;
Cella, David ;
Basch, Ethan .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) :419-429
[6]   Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data [J].
Dale, Oystein ;
Hagen, Kaare Birger .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) :8-17
[7]  
Davis T., 2013, INT CLIN TRIALS
[8]   PRO Data Collection in Clinical Trials Using Mixed Modes: Report of the ISPOR PRO Mixed Modes Good Research Practices Task Force [J].
Eremenco, Sonya ;
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Paty, Jean ;
Coyne, Karin ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
McEntegart, Damian .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (05) :501-516
[9]  
Ganser AL, 2010, EPRO: ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS FOR PATIENT-REPORTED DATA, P49
[10]   Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Greenwood, MC ;
Hakim, AJ ;
Carson, E ;
Doyle, DV .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (01) :66-71