An open-labeled, randomized, multicenter phase IIa study of gambogic acid injection for advanced malignant tumors

被引:88
作者
Chi Yihebali [1 ]
Zhan Xiao-kai [2 ]
Yu Hao [3 ]
Xie Guang-ru [3 ]
Wang Zhen-zhong [4 ]
Xiao Wei [4 ]
Wang Yong-gang [5 ]
Xiong Fu-xing [6 ]
Hu Jun-feng [7 ]
Yang Lin [1 ]
Cui Cheng-xu [1 ]
Wang Jin-wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Med Oncol, Canc Inst & Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Tumor Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[5] Kan Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Lianyungang 222001, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Oncol, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China
[7] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Internal Oncol, Hefei 230022, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
gambogic acid; efficacy; toxicity; advanced malignant tumor; INHIBITS ANGIOGENESIS; TRANSFERRIN RECEPTOR; CANCER-CELLS; APOPTOSIS; CARCINOMA; GROWTH; PHOSPHORYLATION; TARGETS; BGC-823; MICE;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gambogic acid is a pure active compound isolated from the traditional Chinese medicinal plant gamboge (Garcinia morella Desv.). Based on the preliminary results of a phase I study, this phase IIa study compared the efficacy and safety of different dosage schedules of gambogic acid in patients with advanced malignant tumors. Methods Patients with advanced or metastases cancer who had not received any effective routine conventional treatment or who had failed to respond to the existing conventional treatment were randomly assigned to receive either 45 mg/m(2) gambogic acid intravenously from Days 1 to 5 of a 2-week cycle (Group A), or 45 mg/m(2) every other day for a total of five times during a 2-week cycle (Group B). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results Twenty-one patients assigned to Group A and 26 to Group B were included in the final analysis. The ORRs were 14.3% in Group A and 0% in Group B. It was not possible to analyze the significant difference because one of the values was zero. The disease control rates (DCRs) were 76.2% in Group A and 61.5% in Group B (P=0.0456). The observed adverse reactions were mostly Grades I and II, and occurred in most patients after administration of the trial drug. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two arms. Conclusions The preliminary results of this phase IIa exploratory study suggest that gambogic acid has a favorable safety profile when administered at 45 mg/m(2). The DCR was greater in patients receiving gambogic acid on Days 1-5 of a 2-week cycle, but the incidence of adverse reactions was similar irrespective of the administration schedule.
引用
收藏
页码:1642 / 1646
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]   Gambogic acid induces apoptosis and regulates expressions of Bax and Bcl-2 protein in human gastric carcinoma MGC-803 cells [J].
Zhao, L ;
Guo, QL ;
You, QD ;
Wu, ZQ ;
Gu, HY .
BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 27 (07) :998-1003
[22]   Posttranscriptional regulation of the telomerase hTERT by gambogic acid in human gastric carcinoma 823 cells [J].
Zhao, Qing ;
Yang, Yong ;
Yu, Jun ;
You, Qi-Dong ;
Zeng, Shi ;
Gu, Hong-Yan ;
Lu, Na ;
Qi, Qi ;
Liu, Wei ;
Wang, Xiao-Tang ;
Guo, Qing-Long .
CANCER LETTERS, 2008, 262 (02) :223-231
[23]  
Zhou Z. T., 2007, CHIN NEW DRUGS CHIN, V16, P435