An Agenda for Comparing Local Governance and Institutional Collective Action in Canada and the United States

被引:6
作者
Zeemering, Eric S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
institutional collective action; Canada; comparative urban politics; paradiplomacy; cross-border collaboration; COMPARATIVE URBAN GOVERNANCE; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE; RATIONAL CHOICE; POLICY NETWORKS; GOVERNMENT; COOPERATION; COLLABORATION; SERVICES; REFORM;
D O I
10.1177/1078087417738094
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
As neighboring federal systems, Canada and the United States provide an opportunity to compare institutional collective action (ICA) by proximate local governments. After explaining the importance of understanding local governance in Canada and the United States in comparative context, the ICA framework is used to highlight propositions along two paths of inquiry. First, the ICA framework can be used to compare responses to ICA dilemmas in two distinct systems of local governance, focusing on the comparative instance of use and performance of ICA mechanisms. Second, the ICA framework can be used to analyze collaboration and paradiplomacy across the international border. Deploying the ICA framework for comparative research can improve our understanding of local governance and local government reform in both countries.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 886
页数:29
相关论文
共 118 条