The interplay between the abstract and the particular: Research ethics standards and the practice of research as symbolic

被引:8
作者
Peter, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
moral judgment; nursing ethics; reflective equilibrium; research standards;
D O I
10.1177/0894318405284122
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Ethical standards for research with human participants are increasingly important. With respect to nursing research these standards are symbolic of the interplay between the abstract theoretical aspects of bioethical standards and the particulars of nursing practice. In this column, this interplay is symbolized as a reflective equilibrium. These standards are argued to symbolize not only the dialectic relationship between the abstract and the particular in ethics, but also the general lack of a nursing specific articulation of ethical standards. Further understanding of the distinctiveness of nurses' moral judgments and knowledge is presented as necessary in strengthening the reflective equilibrium.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 24
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] *AM NURS ASS, 1995, ETH GUID COND DISS I
  • [2] American Nurses Association, 2015, Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, COD ETH REG NURS
  • [4] BAYLIS F, 1995, HLTH CARE ETHICS CAN
  • [5] Berry D L, 1996, Oncol Nurs Forum, V23, P507
  • [6] Boyle J., 1996, PHILOS PERSPECT, P187
  • [7] Davis A J, 1989, West J Nurs Res, V11, P448, DOI 10.1177/019394598901100407
  • [8] What makes clinical research ethical?
    Emanuel, EJ
    Wendler, D
    Grady, C
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20): : 2701 - 2711
  • [9] Nursing, morality, and emotions: Phase I and phase II clinical trials and patients with cancer
    Krishnasamy, M
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 1999, 22 (04) : 251 - 259
  • [10] Liaschenko Joan, 2003, Minn Med, V86, P35