Validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 in assessing depression following traumatic brain injury

被引:318
作者
Fann, JR
Bombardier, CH
Dikmer, S
Esselman, P
Warms, CA
Pelzer, E
Rau, H
Temkin, N
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biobehav Nursing & Hlth Syst, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
brain injury; depression; diagnosis; PHQ; reliability; SCID; screening; trauma; validity;
D O I
10.1097/00001199-200511000-00003
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To test the validity and reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD) among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Level I trauma center. Participants: 135 adults within I year of complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI. Main Outcome Measures: PHQ-9 Depression Scale, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (SCID). Results: Using a screening criterion of at least 5 PHQ-9 symptoms present at least several days over the last 2 weeks (with one being depressed mood or anhedonia) maximizes sensitivity (0.93) and specificity (0.89) while providing a positive predictive value of 0.63 and a negative predictive value of 0.99 when compared to SCID diagnosis of MDD. Pearson's correlation between the PHQ-9 scores and other depression measures was 0.90 with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist depression subscale and 0.78 with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Test-retest reliability of the PHQ-9 was r = 0.76 and K = 0.46 when using the optimal screening method. Conclusions: The PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable screening tool for detecting MDD in persons with TBI.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 511
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Diagnosing major depression in medical outpatients acceptability of telephone interviews [J].
Allen, K ;
Cull, A ;
Sharpe, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (04) :385-387
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text revision (DSM-IV-TR), V4th, DOI [10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr, DOI 10.1176/DSM10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890420249.DSM-IV-TR]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, User Guide for the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Advances in Medical Psychotherapy
[5]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[6]  
BURTON LA, 1988, J NEUROLOGICAL REHAB, V2, P151
[7]   Comparability of telephone and in-person structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) diagnoses [J].
Cacciola, JS ;
Alterman, AI ;
Rutherford, MJ ;
McKay, JR ;
May, DJ .
ASSESSMENT, 1999, 6 (03) :235-242
[8]  
DEROGATIS L R, 1973, Psychopharmacology Bulletin, V9, P13
[9]  
Derogatis L.R., 1997, SCL-90-R Administration scoring and procedures manual -1-
[10]   EMOTIONAL SEQUELAE OF HEAD-INJURY [J].
DIKMEN, S ;
REITAN, RM .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1977, 2 (06) :492-494