Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning

被引:4
作者
Wyatt, Jonathan J. [1 ,2 ]
McCallum, Hazel M. [1 ,2 ]
Maxwell, Ross J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Northern Ctr Canc Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Positron Emission Tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; PET-MR; Quality Assurance; QA; Radiotherapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; MRI; REPEATABILITY; SENSITIVITY; PET/CT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods: QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electrome-chanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in-house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results: The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were <= 0.7 mm. The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were <= 3% for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was 0.3%. The stability SDs agreed within 0.6 mm, 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions: QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Sensitivity analysis of different quality assurance methods for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy [J].
Adjeiwaah, Mary ;
Garpebring, Anders ;
Nyholm, Tufve .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 :21-27
[2]   Toward PET/MRI as one-stop shop for radiotherapy planning in cervical cancer patients [J].
Ahangari, Sahar ;
Hansen, Naja Liv ;
Olin, Anders Beck ;
Nottrup, Trine Jakobi ;
Ryssel, Heidi ;
Berthelsen, Anne Kiil ;
Lofgren, Johan ;
Loft, Annika ;
Vogelius, Ivan Richter ;
Schnack, Tine ;
Jakoby, Bjoern ;
Kjaer, Andreas ;
Andersen, Flemming Littrup ;
Fischer, Barbara Malene ;
Hansen, Adam Espe .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (08) :1045-1053
[3]   Diffusion Coefficient Measurement Using a Temperature-Controlled Fluid for Quality Control in Multicenter Studies [J].
Chenevert, Thomas L. ;
Galban, Craig J. ;
Ivancevic, Marko K. ;
Rohrer, Susan E. ;
Londy, Frank J. ;
Kwee, Thomas C. ;
Meyer, Charles R. ;
Johnson, Timothy D. ;
Rehemtulla, Alnawaz ;
Ross, Brian D. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (04) :983-987
[4]   Impact of hybrid PET/MR technology on multiparametric imaging and treatment response assessment of cervix cancer [J].
Daniel, Michaela ;
Andrzejewski, Piotr ;
Sturdza, Alina ;
Majercakova, Katarina ;
Baltzer, Pascal ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Wadsak, Wolfgang ;
Mitterhauser, Markus ;
Poetter, Richard ;
Georg, Petra ;
Helbich, Thomas ;
Georg, Dietmar .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (03) :420-425
[5]   Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements [J].
Doot, Robert K. ;
Pierce, Larry A., II ;
Byrd, Darrin ;
Elston, Brian ;
Allberg, Keith C. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. .
TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 7 (01) :48-54
[6]   Intensity modulating and other radiation therapy devices for dose painting [J].
Galvin, James M. ;
De Neve, Wilfried .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (08) :924-930
[7]   Commissioning of MRI-only based treatment planning procedure for external beam radiotherapy of prostate [J].
Kapanen, Mika ;
Collan, Juhani ;
Beule, Annette ;
Seppala, Tiina ;
Saarilahti, Kauko ;
Tenhunen, Mikko .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (01) :127-135
[8]   Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging phantoms: A review and the need for a system phantom [J].
Keenan, Kathryn E. ;
Ainslie, Maureen ;
Barker, Alex J. ;
Boss, Michael A. ;
Cecil, Kim M. ;
Charles, Cecil ;
Chenevert, Thomas L. ;
Clarke, Larry ;
Evelhoch, Jeffrey L. ;
Finn, Paul ;
Gembris, Daniel ;
Gunter, Jeffrey L. ;
Hill, Derek L. G. ;
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Jackson, Edward F. ;
Liu, Guoying ;
Russek, Stephen E. ;
Sharma, Samir D. ;
Steckner, Michael ;
Stupic, Karl F. ;
Trzasko, Joshua D. ;
Yuan, Chun ;
Zheng, Jie .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (01) :48-61
[9]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning [J].
Liney, Gary P. ;
Moerland, Marinus A. .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) :160-168
[10]   Quantifying and Reducing the Effect of Calibration Error on Variability of PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value Measurements [J].
Lockhart, Catherine M. ;
MacDonald, Lawrence R. ;
Alessio, Adam M. ;
McDougald, Wendy A. ;
Doot, Robert K. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (02) :218-224