Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature

被引:406
作者
Bot, SDM [1 ]
Terwee, CB [1 ]
van der Windt, DAWM [1 ]
Bouter, LM [1 ]
Dekker, J [1 ]
de Vet, HCW [1 ]
机构
[1] VU Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1136/ard.2003.007724
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify all available shoulder disability questionnaires designed to measure physical functioning and to evaluate evidence for the clinimetric quality of these instruments. Methods: Systematic literature searches were performed to identify self administered shoulder disability questionnaires. A checklist was developed to evaluate and compare the clinimetric quality of the instruments. Results: Two reviewers identified and evaluated 16 questionnaires by our checklist. Most studies were found for the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale ( DASH), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index ( SPADI), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardised Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES). None of the questionnaires demonstrated satisfactory results for all properties. Most questionnaires claim to measure several domains ( for example, pain, physical, emotional, and social functioning), yet dimensionality was studied in only three instruments. The internal consistency was calculated for seven questionnaires and only one received an adequate rating. Twelve questionnaires received positive ratings for construct validity, although depending on the population studied, four of these questionnaires received poor ratings too. Seven questionnaires were shown to have adequate test-retest reliability (ICC >0.70), but five questionnaires were tested inadequately. In most clinimetric studies only small sample sizes (n< 43) were used. Nearly all publications lacked information on the interpretation of scores. Conclusion: The DASH, SPADI, and ASES have been studied most extensively, and yet even published validation studies of these instruments have limitations in study design, sample sizes, or evidence for dimensionality. Overall, the DASH received the best ratings for its clinimetric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 341
页数:7
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
AMSTUTZ HC, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P7
[2]   Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires [J].
Beaton, D ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (06) :565-572
[3]  
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[4]   Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[5]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[6]   Measurement error and correlation coefficients [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) :41-42
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]  
BOMBARDIER C, 1987, J RHEUMATOL, V14, P6
[9]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[10]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160