Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones?

被引:56
|
作者
Alivizatos, G [1 ]
Skolarikos, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Sismanoglio Hosp, Dept Urol 2, Athens Med Sch, Athens, Greece
关键词
guidelines; indications; open surgery; urinary stones;
D O I
10.1097/01.mou.0000193379.08857.e7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review In the last few decades, with the improvement in endourological surgery and the invention and evolution of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, the indications for open surgery in stone disease have become rare, although open surgery still has a role in selected cases. In this review we discuss the current indications of open surgery for the elimination of urinary calculi, Recent findings A MEDLINE and MeSH search was performed to evaluate currently available guidelines on open stone surgery and identify the evidence-based medicine that support the role of open surgery in treating urinary lithiasis. The latest papers published on open stone surgery are reviewed and conclusions are drawn, based on their results. Summary Open stone surgery should be avoided in most cases, but should be considered for those patients in whom a reasonable number of less invasive procedures would not be useful. The most common indications for open stone surgery include complex stone burden, failure of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or endourological treatment and anatomical abnormalities (such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction and infundibular stenosis with or without renal caliceal diverticulum). The level of evidence for the currently available guidelines is not adequate, mainly because of lack of properly designed, large prospective randomized trials that compare different treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Alternative management of complex renal stones
    Millie Pevzner
    Brian C. Stisser
    Jordan Luskin
    Jeffrey C. Yeamans
    Marina Cheng-Lucey
    John J. Pahira
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2011, 43 : 631 - 638
  • [42] Management of stones in renal caliceal diverticula
    Lechevallier, E.
    Saussine, C.
    Traxer, O.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2008, 18 (12): : 989 - 991
  • [43] Contemporary ureteroscopic management of renal stones
    Proietti, S.
    Knoll, T.
    Giusti, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 681 - 687
  • [44] Bladder and renal stones: management and treatment
    Westenberg, A
    Harper, M
    Zafirakis, H
    Shah, PJR
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2002, 63 (01): : 34 - 41
  • [45] Alternative management of complex renal stones
    Pevzner, Millie
    Stisser, Brian C.
    Luskin, Jordan
    Yeamans, Jeffrey C.
    Cheng-Lucey, Marina
    Pahira, John J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 43 (03) : 631 - 638
  • [46] CHALLENGES WITH PERCUTANEOUS MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONES
    Rais-Bahrami, S.
    Okhunov, Z.
    Okeke, Z.
    Smith, A. D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A366 - A366
  • [47] The assessment and management of renal and ureteric stones
    Hanna, Luke
    Bultitude, Matthew
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2019, 10 (05) : 8 - 12
  • [48] Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of large renal pelvic stones
    Cicek, Mehmet Cagatay
    Asi, Tariq
    Gunseren, Kadir Omur
    Kilicarslan, Hakan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (06)
  • [49] A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ≥ 2 CM
    Sari, Sercan
    Ozok, Hakki Ugur
    Cakici, Mehmet Caglar
    Ozdemir, Harun
    Bas, Okan
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Sagnak, Levent
    Senturk, Aykut Bugra
    Ersoy, Hamit
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (01) : 2949 - U72
  • [50] Renal Stones Evolving Epidemiology and Management
    Schissel, Beth L.
    Johnson, Bernadette K.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (07) : 676 - 681