Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones?

被引:59
作者
Alivizatos, G [1 ]
Skolarikos, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Sismanoglio Hosp, Dept Urol 2, Athens Med Sch, Athens, Greece
关键词
guidelines; indications; open surgery; urinary stones;
D O I
10.1097/01.mou.0000193379.08857.e7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review In the last few decades, with the improvement in endourological surgery and the invention and evolution of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, the indications for open surgery in stone disease have become rare, although open surgery still has a role in selected cases. In this review we discuss the current indications of open surgery for the elimination of urinary calculi, Recent findings A MEDLINE and MeSH search was performed to evaluate currently available guidelines on open stone surgery and identify the evidence-based medicine that support the role of open surgery in treating urinary lithiasis. The latest papers published on open stone surgery are reviewed and conclusions are drawn, based on their results. Summary Open stone surgery should be avoided in most cases, but should be considered for those patients in whom a reasonable number of less invasive procedures would not be useful. The most common indications for open stone surgery include complex stone burden, failure of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or endourological treatment and anatomical abnormalities (such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction and infundibular stenosis with or without renal caliceal diverticulum). The level of evidence for the currently available guidelines is not adequate, mainly because of lack of properly designed, large prospective randomized trials that compare different treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Treatment of complete staghorn stones: A prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Al-Kohlany, KM ;
Shokeir, AA ;
Mosbah, A ;
Mohsen, T ;
Shoma, AM ;
Eraky, I ;
El-Kenawy, M ;
El-Kappany, HA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (02) :469-473
[2]   THE ROLE OF OPEN STONE SURGERY SINCE EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
ASSIMOS, DG ;
BOYCE, WH ;
HARRISON, LH ;
MCCULLOUGH, DL ;
KROOVAND, RL ;
SWEAT, KR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (02) :263-267
[3]   A COMPARISON OF ANATROPHIC NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH STAGHORN CALCULI [J].
ASSIMOS, DG ;
WRENN, JJ ;
HARRISON, LH ;
MCCULLOUGH, DL ;
BOYCE, WH ;
TAYLOR, CL ;
ZAGORIA, RJ ;
DYER, RB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04) :710-714
[4]   A 10-year experience of managing ureteric calculi: changing trends towards endourological intervention - is there a role for open surgery? [J].
Ather, MH ;
Paryani, J ;
Memon, A ;
Sulaiman, MN .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (03) :173-177
[5]   Indications for open stone removal of urinary calculi [J].
Bichler, KH ;
Lahme, S ;
Strohmaier, WL .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1997, 59 (02) :102-108
[6]   KIDNEY STONE REMOVAL - PERCUTANEOUS VERSUS SURGICAL LITHOTOMY [J].
BRANNEN, GE ;
BUSH, WH ;
CORREA, RJ ;
GIBBONS, RP ;
ELDER, JS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 133 (01) :6-12
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE COSTS AND MORBIDITY OF PERCUTANEOUS AND OPEN FLANK PROCEDURES [J].
BROWN, MW ;
CARSON, CC ;
DUNNICK, NR ;
WEINERTH, JL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (06) :1150-1152
[8]  
DAWSON C, 2005, EVIDENCE UROLOGY, P1
[9]   Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy [J].
Deger, S ;
Tuellmann, M ;
Schoenberger, B ;
Winkelmann, B ;
Peters, R ;
Loening, SA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (03) :263-265
[10]  
Eddy D M, 1990, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V6, P31