Divergence and convergence in nutrition science

被引：1

作者：

Penders, Bart ^{[1
]}

Spruit, Shannon L. ^{[2
]}

Sikkema, Jan ^{[3
]}

Maat, Jan ^{[4
]}

Schuurbiers, Daan ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care CAPHRI, Hlth Eth & Soc, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands

[2] Delft Univ Technol, Sch Technol Business & Management, Values Technol & Innovat, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands

[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Dev & Innovat, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands

[4] TIFN, NL-6700 AN Wageningen, Netherlands

[5] Responsible Innovat Collect, NL-6523 RP Nijmegen, Netherlands

来源：

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2015年 / 45卷 / 02期

关键词：

Nutrigenomics; Divergence; Convergence; Research policy; Collaboration; Research cultures; NUTRIGENOMICS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.008

中图分类号：

TS2 [食品工业];

学科分类号：

0832 ;

摘要：

Nutrigenomics diverged from mainstream nutrition science, ideologically, instrumentally and culturally, due to the establishment of a protective niche. That protection is fading. This article chronicles a case in which convergence between nutrigenomics and nutrition science is pursued. Here we report the opportunities and hurdles that researchers within two large Dutch research consortia encountered when trying to engineer collaboration. The most salient hurdles are the complexity of and unfamiliarity with nutrigenomics, unclear and unshared notions of relevance; difficulties in organising data exchange; and the existence of two research cultures. Overcoming these technical and social hurdles will require the development of a shared 'future' for the relationship between nutrigenomics and nutrition science. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：245 / 250

页数：6

共 24 条

[1] [Anonymous], 2014, BODIES EVIDENCE ANTH
[2] [Anonymous], 1999, Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge
[3] [Anonymous], HIST ARGUMENT EXPLAN
[4] 26th Hohenheim Consensus Conference, September 11, 2010 Scientific substantiation of health claims: Evidence-based nutrition
Biesalski, Hans Konrad
Aggett, Peter J.
Anton, Robert
Bernstein, Paul S.
Blumberg, Jeffrey
Heaney, Robert P.
Henry, Jeya
Nolan, John M.
Richardson, David P.
van Ommen, Ben
Witkamp, Renger F.
Rijkers, Ger T.
Zoellner, Iris
[J]. NUTRITION, 2011, 27 (10) : S1 - S20
[5] Collins H.M., 2007, Rethinking Expertise
[6] Fleck Ludwik., 1935, ENTSTEHUNG ENTWICKLU
[7] DISSENT IN SCIENCE - STYLES OF SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE IN THE CONTROVERSY OVER THE CAUSE OF AIDS
FUJIMURA, JH
CHOU, DY
[J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 38 (08) : 1017 - 1036
[8] Gieryn Thomas, 1999, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line
[9] Introduction to the Special Guest-Edited Issue on Scientific Collaboration
Hackett, EJ
[J]. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2005, 35 (05) : 667 - 671
[10] STYLE FOR HISTORIANS AND PHILOSOPHERS
HACKING, I
[J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1992, 23 (01): : 1 - 20

← 1 2 3 →