Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:27
作者
Meek, C. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lindsay, R. S. [4 ]
Scott, E. M. [5 ]
Aiken, C. E. [1 ]
Myers, J. [6 ]
Reynolds, R. M. [7 ]
Simmons, D. [8 ]
Yamamoto, J. M. [9 ,10 ]
McCance, D. R. [11 ]
Murphy, H. R. [2 ,12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Metab Res Labs, Wellcome Trust MRC Inst Metab Sci, Cambridge, England
[2] Cambridge Univ Hosp, Diabet Pregnancy Team, Cambridge, England
[3] Addenbrookess Hosp, Cambridge Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Glasgow, British Heart Fdn Glasgow Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Inst Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Dept Populat & Clin Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Manchester, St Marys Hosp, Maternal & Fetal Hlth Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Queens Med Res Inst, Ctr Cardiovasc Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[8] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[10] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[11] Reg Ctr Endocrinol & Diabet, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[12] Univ East Anglia, Bob Champ Res & Educ Bldg, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[13] Kings Coll London, Div Womens Hlth, London, England
关键词
GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TESTS; DIAGNOSIS; ASSOCIATION; INSULIN;
D O I
10.1111/dme.14380
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of alternative diagnostic strategies to oral glucose tolerance tests, including random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c), during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Retrospective service data (Cambridge, UK; 17 736 consecutive singleton pregnancies, 2004-2008; 826 consecutive gestational diabetes pregnancies, 2014-2019) and 361 women with >= 1 gestational diabetes risk factor (OPHELIA prospective observational study, UK) were included. Pregnancy outcomes included gestational diabetes (National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence or International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria), diabetes in pregnancy (WHO criteria), Caesarean section, large-for-gestational age infant, neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and unadjusted logistic regression were used to compare random plasma glucose, fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) performance. Results Gestational diabetes diagnosis was significantly associated with random plasma glucose at 12 weeks [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for both criteria 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.83)], fasting plasma glucose [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.98)] and HbA(1c)at 28 weeks' gestation [National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.90); International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups: 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)]. Each measure predicts some, but not all, pregnancy outcomes studied. At 12 weeks, similar to 5% of women would be identified using random plasma glucose >= 8.5 mmol/l (sensitivity 42%; specificity 96%) and at 28 weeks using HbA(1c) >= 39 mmol/mol (sensitivity 26%; specificity 96%) or fasting plasma glucose >= 5.2-5.4 mmol/l (sensitivity 18-41%; specificity 97-98%). Conclusions Random plasma glucose at 12 weeks, and fasting plasma glucose or HbA(1c)at 28 weeks identify women with hyperglycaemia at risk of suboptimal pregnancy outcomes. These opportunistic laboratory tests perform adequately for risk stratification when oral glucose tolerance testing is not available.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Improving outcomes in gestational diabetes: does gestational weight gain matter?
    Aiken, C. E. M.
    Hone, L.
    Murphy, H. R.
    Meek, C. L.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2019, 36 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [2] [Anonymous], Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus: Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation
  • [3] [Anonymous], NICE guidelines NG3
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, CLIN GUID 63 DIAB PR
  • [5] Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: A Complementary Method Beyond the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test to Identify Hyperglycemia During Pregnancy
    Ardilouze, Amelie
    Bouchard, Patricia
    Hivert, Marie-France
    Simard, Catherine
    Allard, Catherine
    Garant, Marie-Pierre
    Menard, Julie
    Ouellet, Annie
    Houde, Ghislaine
    Pesant, Marie-Helene
    Baillargeon, Jean-Patrice
    Ardilouze, Jean-Luc
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2019, 43 (08) : 627 - 635
  • [6] Metabolic syndrome in childhood: Association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus
    Boney, CM
    Verma, A
    Tucker, R
    Vohr, BR
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (03) : E290 - E296
  • [7] Random Blood Glucose Measurement at Antenatal Booking to Screen for Overt Diabetes in Pregnancy
    Church, David
    Halsall, David
    Meek, Claire
    Parker, Richard A.
    Murphy, Helen R.
    Simmons, David
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (10) : 2217 - 2219
  • [8] Draper ES, 2015, PERINATAL CONFIDENTI
  • [9] An Early Pregnancy HbA1c ≥5.9% (41 mmol/mol) Is Optimal for Detecting Diabetes and Identifies Women at Increased Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
    Hughes, Ruth C. E.
    Moore, M. Peter
    Gullam, Joanna E.
    Mohamed, Khadeeja
    Rowan, Janet
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (11) : 2953 - 2959
  • [10] Barriers to completing oral glucose tolerance testing in women at risk of gestational diabetes
    Lachmann, E. H.
    Fox, R. A.
    Dennison, R. A.
    Usher-Smith, J. A.
    Meek, C. L.
    Aiken, C. E.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 37 (09) : 1482 - 1489