Convergent incremental optimization transfer algorithms: Application to tomography

被引:46
作者
Ahn, S [1 ]
Fessler, JA [1 ]
Blatt, D [1 ]
Hero, AO [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
incremental optimization transfer; maximum-likelihood estimation; penalized-likelihood estimation; statistical image reconstruction; transmission tomography;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2005.862740
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
No convergent ordered subsets (OS) type image reconstruction algorithms for transmission tomography have been proposed to date. In contrast, in emission tomography, there are two known families of convergent OS algorithms: methods that use relaxation parameters [1], and methods based on the incremental expectation-maximization (EM) approach [2]. This paper generalizes the incremental EM approach [3] by introducing a general framework, "incremental optimization transfer." The proposed algorithms accelerate convergence speeds and ensure global convergence without requiring relaxation parameters. The general optimization transfer framework allows the use of a very broad family of surrogate functions, enabling the development of new algorithms [4]. This paper provides the first convergent OS-type algorithm for (nonconcave) penalized-likelihood (PL) transmission image reconstruction by using separable paraboloidal surrogates (SPS) [5] which yield closed-form maximization steps. We found it is very effective to achieve fast convergence rates by starting with an OS algorithm with a large number of subsets and switching to the new "transmission incremental optimization transfer (TRIOT)" algorithm. Results show that TRIOT is faster in increasing the PL objective than nonincremental ordinary SPS and even OS-SPS yet is convergent.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]   A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihoods in emission tomography [J].
Browne, J ;
DePierro, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) :687-699
[12]   Accelerating the EMML algorithm and related iterative algorithms by rescaled block-iterative methods [J].
Byrne, CL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1998, 7 (01) :100-109
[13]   Comments on "Efficient training algorithms for HMM's using incremental estimation" [J].
Byrne, W ;
Gunawardana, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SPEECH AND AUDIO PROCESSING, 2000, 8 (06) :751-754
[14]   STRONG UNDERRELAXATION IN KACZMARZS METHOD FOR INCONSISTENT SYSTEMS [J].
CENSOR, Y ;
EGGERMONT, PPB ;
GORDON, D .
NUMERISCHE MATHEMATIK, 1983, 41 (01) :83-92
[15]   Component averaging: An efficient iterative parallel algorithm for large and sparse unstructured problems [J].
Censor, Y ;
Gordon, D ;
Gordon, R .
PARALLEL COMPUTING, 2001, 27 (06) :777-808
[16]   ROW-ACTION METHODS FOR HUGE AND SPARSE SYSTEMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS [J].
CENSOR, Y .
SIAM REVIEW, 1981, 23 (04) :444-446
[17]   Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography [J].
De Pierro, AR ;
Yamagishi, MEB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (04) :280-288
[18]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[19]   Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography [J].
Elbakri, IA ;
Fessler, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2002, 21 (02) :89-99
[20]   Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography [J].
Erdogan, H ;
Fessler, JA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :2835-2851