Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment

被引:28
作者
Geckil, Emine [1 ]
Ege, Emel [2 ]
Akin, Belgin [2 ]
Goz, Fugen [3 ]
机构
[1] Adiyaman Univ, Sch Hlth, TR-02040 Adiyaman, Turkey
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Konya, Turkey
[3] Harran Univ, Sch Hlth, Sanliurfa, Turkey
关键词
nurse; nursing student; professional nursing values; scale adaptation; values; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; STUDENTS; NURSES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00202.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS-R). Methods: The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and clinical nurses (n = 57). Data was collected using the NPVS-R. For NPVS validity, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine item validity. Results: Item CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.0, and total CVI was 0.93. Construct validity was examined using factor analysis and the five factors were identified as original NPVS-R. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability. The 26-item NPVS had a standardized alpha coefficient of 0.92. Test-retest reliability scale was r = 0.76 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our analyses showed that the Turkish version of NPVS-R has high validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 200
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations [J].
Polit, Denise F. ;
Beck, Cheryl Tatano .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2006, 29 (05) :489-497
[22]  
Polit DF., 2006, Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice, V6
[23]  
Potter P.A., 2001, Fundamentals of nursing, V5th
[24]   Values grading among nursing students - Differences between the ethnic groups [J].
Rassin, R. N. Michal .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (05) :458-463
[25]  
Shinyashiki Gilberto Tadeu, 2006, Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, V14, P601, DOI 10.1590/S0104-11692006000400019
[26]  
Tezbasaran AA., 1996, LIKERT TYPE SCALE DE
[27]  
Thorpe K, 2003, J NURS EDUC, V42, P83
[28]  
Uustal D B, 1984, Nurse Educ, V9, P9, DOI 10.1097/00006223-198400910-00012
[29]  
Vezeau T.M., 2006, International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, V3, P1
[30]  
Weis D, 1993, J Prof Nurs, V9, P336, DOI 10.1016/8755-7223(93)90008-Z