The interplay of local attraction, context and domain-general cognitive control in activation and suppression of semantic distractors during sentence comprehension

被引:28
作者
Nozari, Nazbanou [1 ,2 ]
Trueswell, John C. [3 ]
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurol, Sch Med, 1629 Thames St,Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Cognit Sci, 1629 Thames St,Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, 3815 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Sentence comprehension; Eye-tracking; Cognitive control; Local attraction; Distractor activation; VISUAL WORLD PARADIGM; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MEMORY; RESOURCE; CAPTURE; YOUNG; FORM;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-016-1068-8
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
During sentence comprehension, real-time identification of a referent is driven both by local, context-independent lexical information and by more global sentential information related to the meaning of the utterance as a whole. This paper investigates the cognitive factors that limit the consideration of referents that are supported by local lexical information but not supported by more global sentential information. In an eye-tracking paradigm, participants heard sentences like "She will eat the red pear" while viewing four black-and-white (colorless) line-drawings. In the experimental condition, the display contained a "local attractor" (e.g., a heart), which was locally compatible with the adjective but incompatible with the context ("eat"). In the control condition, the local attractor was replaced by a picture which was incompatible with the adjective (e.g., "igloo"). A second factor manipulated contextual constraint, by using either a constraining verb (e.g., "eat"), or a non-constraining one (e.g., "see"). Results showed consideration of the local attractor, the magnitude of which was modulated by verb constraint, but also by each subject's cognitive control abilities, as measured in a separate Flanker task run on the same subjects. The findings are compatible with a processing model in which the interplay between local attraction, context, and domain-general control mechanisms determines the consideration of possible referents.
引用
收藏
页码:1942 / 1953
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J].
Altmann, GTM ;
Kamide, Y .
COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) :247-264
[2]  
Barr D., 2006, HDB PSYCHOLINGUISTIC, P901, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50024-9
[3]   Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground [J].
Barr, Dale J. .
COGNITION, 2008, 109 (01) :18-40
[4]   Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults [J].
Borovsky, Arielle ;
Elmana, Jeffrey L. ;
Fernald, Anne .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 112 (04) :417-436
[5]   The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension [J].
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (05) :893-900
[6]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[7]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[8]  
Caplan D, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P77
[9]   Perception and presupposition in real-time language comprehension: Insights from anticipatory processing [J].
Chambers, Craig G. ;
Juan, Valerie San .
COGNITION, 2008, 108 (01) :26-50
[10]   Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing [J].
Choi, Youngon ;
Trueswell, John C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 106 (01) :41-61